Ayodhya case hearing – Rajiv Dhavan furious, protests sitting of Rajyasabha MP Subramanian Swamy in front row of court room

Rajiv Dhawan's argument was, Swamy neither represents any party involved in the case nor is a lawyer. Therefore, he should not be permitted to sit in the courtroom

yodhya case hearing -Rajiv Dhavan furious, protests sitting of Rajyasabha MP Subramanian Swamy in front row of court room
yodhya case hearing -Rajiv Dhavan furious, protests sitting of Rajyasabha MP Subramanian Swamy in front row of court room

Coomi Kapoor writes in her column in “the Indian express” – “seeing Subramanian Swamy sits quietly in the courtroom during the proceeding of Ayodhya case, Rajeev Dhawan demanded that the judges ask Subramanian Swamy to leave the court as he neither represents the case nor is a lawyer.”

During the proceedings of the Ayodhya case, Rajiv Dhawan, the lawyer representing the Muslims or Sunni Wakf Board got angry at the sight Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy. During the course of the proceedings in the matter of Ram Jamnabhoomi by a bench of judges under Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Swamy was seen sitting in the front row. In her article in the Indian express senior journalist, Coomi Kapoor wrote that the moment Rajiv Dhawan saw Swamy he got angry and asked Swamy to vacate the seat. His argument was, Swamy neither represents any party involved in the case nor is a lawyer. Therefore, he should not be permitted to sit in the courtroom.

 The opposition argued that before the time of Aurangazeb, there is no mention of Babri Masjid in any of the texts, his answer was while writing about china, Marco Polo too forgot to mention the Great Wall of China in his work.

Actually, during the hearings of Ayodhya case, the courtroom is filled with the lawyers. At any point of time, there are at least 30 lawyers who are standing, writes Coomi Kapoor. The moment Dhawan saw Swamy sitting in the front row, he objected Swamy’s presence in the court. She writes, “seeing Subramaninan Swamy sit quietly in the courtroom during the proceeding of Ayodhya case, Rajeev Dhawan demanded that the judges to ask Subramanian Swamy to leave the court as he neither represents the case nor is a lawyer.”

Dhawan justified saying that when he went to the parliament, he was sent to the visitors gallery. Responding to Dhawan, Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that if he really wants to go to Rajya Sabha, he should become an MP. Significantly, Dhawan represents Sunni Wakf Board in the Ayodhya case. During the proceedings in the case, he often comes up some deadly arguments. Like the one where, the opposition argued that before the time of Aurangazeb, there is no mention of Babri Masjid in any of the texts, his answer was while writing about china, Marco Polo too forgot to mention the Great Wall of China in his work.

 

 

We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
Team PGurus

22 COMMENTS

  1. Babur should have born at the time when Sri Ram was in action. He destroyed much more stronger enemy and set up example to not to keep bad eye’s on others wife. Babur destroyed his mandir and set up example to now you keep bad eye’s on others wife.

  2. He is angry for the simple reason that Dr Subramanian Swamy is the prime architect to bring this long drawn out legal battle to its logical conclusion and most importantly , he knows very well that he and his party are going to lose this battle for want of any worthy evidence in their favour and Dr Subramanian Swamy is the face of this proposed fully justified Hindu Victory – for Mr Dhawan to vent his undiluted arrogance and mental fury !

  3. If Suicide bombers can get Virgins why cant the Mullas go themselves. If Goat can be sacrificed and go to heaven why dont the person himself kill himself and his family and go to heaven?

    • This applies to animal sacrifices made in Hindu rituals, particularly tribal. Animal sacrifices are no longer practiced by Hindus, by and large after the ban. Hence, animal sacrifice on Bakrid etc., and halal killing shd be banned too as it’s a cruel way of slaughter.

  4. Being an advocate does not mean that you will eat shit. This rajiv is eating shit of pigs now. Lets alao see what karma effect is on his fate.

  5. We indian hindus CHEATED throughout , by islam minded congress WHO MADE HINDU LANDS AFTER PARTITION A SECULAR ONE WITHOUT AUTHORITY THUS CREATING THIS HAZARD OF AYODHYA PETITION DEMAND- rectification of mistakes of past and this Rajib is creating a FUSS!
    DR SUBRAMANYAN SWAMY IS A WATCHMAN OF HINDU INTERESTS !TAJIB SHUT UP!

  6. Rajiv Dhawan Pakipanjabi pitviper Pakistani brother R.K Dhawan, wth Italian White skinned Xtian barbarian aasteen ke naagin (ALL THESE WHITE DRACULAS ARE, THEY HAVE EXTERMINATED PEOPLE WHO FED AND SAVED THEIR EVIL SATANIC SOULS LEAVING THE FILTHY WHITE EVIL XTIAN BODIES, even they want to live). is suspected of murders of Indira, Sanjay, Rajiv and M.R. Scindhia. Dr Swamy shd have taken a few BOUNCER Volenteers with him to kick the life out of this pakistani mad dog

  7. Being a INDIAN DR SWAMY HAS ALL THE RIGHT TO BE IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA..
    Being a filthy Gutter pakistani Pakipanjabi Pig, Rajoiv Dhawan HAS NO RIGHT TO BE IN INDIA LEAVE ALONE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
    These Naked Hungry, raped, orgied cowardly Pakipanjabis beggars, but pitvipers, most toxic genetic lumpens who should be killed in sight, who were rightly slaughtered, deserved all gang rapes and beheadings, because they were family brothel runners of Brits and their dogshit cleaners, HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE IN INDIA, AND THESE WHITE BARBARIAN DEMON CROSSED DNA DRACULAS ARE HYBRID OUTSIDERS, PORKIS 5TH COLUMN AND OCCUPIERS IN INDIA..WHITE BARBARIAN SAVAGES WHO WITH BRITS KILLED 200 MILLION INDIANS..THEY ARE BIGGEST DRACULAINE COMMUNITY WHO HAVE KILLED MORE THAN 20 CRORE INDIANS AND PAKISTANIS SINCE 1947..THEY NEED TO BE EITHER SLAUGHTERED OR DRIVEN AWAY TO SYRIA, ISIS NEEDS SLUTS, WHICH THEIR WOMEN WILL GLADLY BECOME

  8. Mr Dhawan,

    Watch your arrogance. Never ever think you are above Dr Swamy when it comes to legal knowledge even though he got no Law degree. You will have to pay heavy price for your arrogance!

  9. CJ rightly points out that if one has to sit in RS he has to be elected to that place. If one has to be in Court no such requirement except interested in the case like any one else. Possibly Dhawan is afraid that Dr. Swamy will notice some lacunae in him while directly viewing him in Court.

  10. So what did the court decide.Dr swamy. Being a Hindu,he has all rights to attend the court,as the case is pertaining to Lord Ramas Temple in ayodhya.

    • My question is when Babur destroyed Ram Mandir what exactly Sir Sri Ramchandra was doing? Why the all powerful God Mr Ram couldn’t prevent the destruction of his own Mandir? Is it because Mr Ram was weaker than Md Babur? was Ram afraid of Babur’s powerful army? It is impossible for a mlechha invader to be more powerful than a Hindu God. He would’ve definitely beat the shit out of that mlechha Babur and protected his Mandir, if at all there was a Mandir and Babur tried any Hanky-panky and the Mandi would still be standing today. Alternatively if a temple was really there and Babur destroyed, the sad conclusion is that Md Babur was stronger than Mr Ramchandra, since he couldn’t protect his own temple from being destroyed. Sad, very very sad.

      • So what happened to Allah Hu Akhbar when Saddam Hussein got arrested and hanged to death by the Christian US? Jesus the messenger is more powerful the ALLAH Hu Akhbar? Why can’t the damn Muslims just pray to ALLAH Hu Akhbar to save the Babri Masjid so that Ram can lose the case? So much stupidity in your argument that only a rabid dog could possibly give you some marks and that too for stupidity.

        • Religious figures are from texts only. They don’t exist. They are meant as lighthouses, guiding people on right path. Not to fight wars! Let’s keep discussion dignified and civilised

      • Absolutely right. This CJI is a no nonsense person. If Dr. Swamy’s presence in SC was impermissible, CJI wouldn’t have allowed it. Rajiv dhavan must realise this basic decency

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here