Demographic threat behind stir: Jammu Bar

Jammu Bar Association said that the stir is against a deep-rooted conspiracy to change the demography of Jammu

The J&K High Court Bar Association, Jammu, (Jammu Bar Association) informed the committee constituted by the Bar Council of India that its recent strike was driven by concerns over a deep-rooted conspiracy to cause demographic changes in Jammu province and hurt the sentiments of the State’s minority community, i.e., the Hindus.

The Jammu Bar Association contended that illegal settlements of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis were springing up at strategic locations in Jammu, including Army Camps, Railway Station, Airport, bridges, on Jammu’s high hills and along the national highway.

It demanded an investigation into the credentials of persons like Talib Hussain, a so-called social worker who, it alleged, was leading the opposition to a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the murder of a girl child in Rassana village, Kathua, and communalising the situation in the State.

The Bar Council of India’s representatives visited Rassana village in district Kathua on April 19, 2018, and arrived in Jammu city on April 20. The Jammu Bar Association informed the Bar Council of India (BCI) that the State Government had issued a directive to Forest officials in Jammu on February 14, 2018, to ignore encroachment on State and Forest land by Tribals, and told the Inspector General of Police Jammu, not to provide protection for the eviction of such persons and refrain from implementing Section 188 RPC. The Jammu Bar added that the Tribal Population mostly resides in Jammu province and is known for its nationalism and respect for the National Flag.

On learning of the order, the Bar Association called a meeting of its Advisory, Executive, & Special Invitees’ Committees on March 16, 2018 to discuss this illegal order of the Tribal Affairs Department; the deportation of illegally settled immigrants in and around Jammu who pose a security threat; resolving the anxieties of people of Nowshera, Sunderbani & Kalakote; and the demand for a CBI enquiry into the Rassana Murder Case (Kathua Case).

The Jammu Bar Association contended that illegal settlements of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis were springing up at strategic locations in Jammu, including Army Camps, Railway Station, Airport, bridges, on Jammu’s high hills and along the national highway. In this light, the directions of the State Government to Deputy Commissioners and IGF Jammu to promote demographic changes and bovine smuggling, subverting the rule of law, had to be taken head-on. The recent attack on the Army Camp at Sunjwan Jammu is evidence of the gravity of the danger.

Explaining the demand for a CBI probe in the Rassana murder case, the Bar Association pointed out that after the First Information Report (FIR) was lodged, the Chief Minister suo moto declared the incident to be one of rape and murder, though the medical board had not even prepared the post-mortem/ autopsy report. Significantly, the medical board was constituted twice.

The Special Investigation Team, including officers from the Crime Branch, was reconstituted thrice, each time headed by a different officer. Around this time, the victim family approached the High Court of J&K (OWP No. 259/2018 titled Mohd. Akhter V/s State and Other) through advocate Deepika Singh Rajawat and expressed dissatisfaction with the Crime Branch. The people of Hiranagar, Kathua were also not satisfied with the Crime Branch investigation.

Hence, the Bar Association concluded that the victim family would not get justice without a CBI investigation. The High Court is monitoring the investigation, given the sensitive nature of the case, which could trigger a communal divide though the perpetrator(s) of such a shameful act and the victim cannot be linked to a religion. To stem a potential communal divide, in view of the investigating agency portraying a Hindu sacred place as the site of the alleged heinous crime and destruction of evidence, and torturing three young persons to make false statements before the Magistrate (recorded under section 164-A CrPC), the Jammu Bar Association took up the demand for a CBI probe.

The General House of the Bar Association endorsed these demands on April 3, 2018. It also decided to hold meetings with the civil society of Jammu, and various professional organisations in Jammu region on April 7, in the office of the High Court Bar Association, to mobilise public opinion on these subjects. The Association also resolved to suspend work from April 4 to 7, in support of these issues, and held a protest rally in Jammu city on April 6.

On April 7, various civil society bodies and prominent leaders of various organisations met with members of the Bar Association and decided to hold a complete Jammu Bandh and Chaka Jam on April 11, 2018. The people of Jammu voluntarily and peacefully supported the Bandh; no untoward incident occurred.

Meanwhile, the J&K Crime Branch filed a charge sheet in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Kathua, about 100 km from Jammu. Traditionally, all agitations by the Jammu Bar Association are supported by all District and Muffasil Bar Associations.

The Jammu Bar alleged that the Srinagar Bar “is a constituent of Hurriyat” and said it was forced to resort to boycotting the courts – a very rare act – because the political, social and economic justice of the people of Jammu was at stake.

Despite this, the National Media and others launched a vilification campaign against the Jammu Bar Association, and falsely alleged that the Association obstructed the filing of the charge-sheet in the Court. As the charge-sheet was filed in distant Kathua, the obstruction, if any, cannot be attributed to the office bearers of the Jammu Bar Association.

After the charge-sheet was filed in Kathua, the Jammu Bar Association limited the Jammu Bandh to just two demands – deportation of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis from Jammu to any other place in India, and withdrawal of the directions given in the meeting of Feb. 14, 2018, which was chaired by Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti. The Bar explicitly delinked the demand for CBI enquiry into the Kathua case as the matter had landed in Court.

Despite such calibrated action, some media channels launched a malicious campaign against the Bandh call in Jammu. This compelled the Supreme Court of India to take cognizance of the alleged rape and murder case in Rassana, Kathua, and to issue notices to the office bearers of the District Court Bar Association Kathua and Jammu Bar Association, the Bar Council of India and the J&K Bar Council to explain the alleged obstruction in the filing of the charge sheet and the lawyers representing the victim.

Out of deference to the Bar Council of India, J&K High Court, and the Supreme Court, the Jammu Bar Association decided to resume work while continuing to agitate through peaceful and constitutional methods, for deportation of Rohingyas and Bangladeshis who have illegally settled in and around Jammu and pose a security threat. The Bar Association demands to rescind the directions issued at the meeting of February 14, 2018, which was chaired by Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti.

The Bar vehemently denied obstructing advocate Deepika Singh Rajawat who appeared in Court on behalf of the victim family. Indeed, one Mohd. Akhtar filed a writ petition in the High Court of J&K through advocate Deepika Singh Rajawat (OWP No. 259/20018), which was listed for the first time on February 9, 2018. As per the interim orders passed in this petition, Advocate Deepika Singh Rajawat appeared in OWP No. 259/2018; the High Court monitored the investigation on each and every date fixed in the Rassana case, viz., February 9, 19, 21; March 9, 14, April 9 and 11 when the charge-sheet was filed in Kathua.

After enumerating this sequence of events, the Jammu Bar members told the Bar Council of India that they apprehend grave threats to their security, life, and property as the State has miserably failed to perform its constitutional duty. Rather, its acts of omission and commission are encouraging forces hell-bent on changing Jammu’s demography so that the minorities are made insecure and forced to toe line of anti-national forces, duly encouraged and patronized by foreign powers, especially Pakistan.

The Jammu Bar alleged that the Srinagar Bar “is a constituent of Hurriyat” and said it was forced to resort to boycotting the courts – a very rare act – because the political, social and economic justice of the people of Jammu was at stake.

The members of the J&K High Court Bar Association Jammu who met with the Bar Council of India included president B.S. Slathia, vice president Sachin Gupta, general secretary Prem N. Sadotra, and others.

Follow me
Sandhya Jain is a writer of political and contemporary affairs. A post graduate in Political Science from the University of Delhi, she is a student of the myriad facets of Indian civilisation. Her published works include Adi Deo Arya Devata. A Panoramic View of Tribal-Hindu Cultural Interface, Rupa, 2004; and Evangelical Intrusions. Tripura: A Case Study, Rupa, 2009. She has contributed to other publications, including a chapter on Jain Dharma in “Why I am a Believer: Personal Reflections on Nine World Religions,” ed. Arvind Sharma, Penguin India, 2009.
Sandhya Jain
Follow me
Latest posts by Sandhya Jain (see all)

11 COMMENTS

  1. Mehbooba Mufti’s credentials itself is suspect. When her father was the Union Home Minister she was abducted by terrorists demanding release of some their fellow terrorists in jail. Earlier the govt which was adamant and did not bow to their wishes had the terrorists killing two senior public servants in Srinagar. It was then Mehbooba Mufti was kidnapped. Many believe that she had played along with her abductors. And lo and behold! Her father in the Union cabinet suddenly forgets all tall talk and the jailed terrorists were freed! The BJP leadership could not have been ignorant of these developments and they must surely be having sound reasons for sharing power with her. Only hope the traitors and terrorists do not have the last laugh!

    • It was Mehbooba’s sister who was abducted. Has been kept away from the public glare since then, and is probably settled in Bangalore.

  2. Hang Mehboob, ABdulla father & Son, Geelani, Lone, Mirwaiaz and his American wife and Golem Nabi Azad in public.
    Disenfranchise all Muslims in Kashmir for 10 years for introspection and reform.
    Restore Shankaracharya Mutt in Srinagar and al other destroyed Hindu Temples.
    Burn down Hazrat-LKB Mosque.

  3. Drive out all the Rohingya’s . dangerous people, and shameless, crying first for sympathy and doing Namak harami to those who helped them. terrorist, drug runners, goons in the name of refugees

  4. This is not some thing new the efforts were on for demographic change of Jammu since long .The Kashmiri dominated politics of the state time and again claim that the state is Muslim majority state so under a plan efforts are being made to reduce Jammu to Muslim majority province to suit their nefarious designs.The present political dispensation should address to this issue otherwise it will be too late .

  5. The need of the hour is eternal vigilance against moves to change the demography; GOI should take immediate steps to stop another exodus

Leave a Reply to Krishna vijayan Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here