Blaming EVM and EC when an adverse verdict appears imminent? The truth behind EVM - VVPATs and why they are much better
Delhi Waqf Board case: AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan appears before ED According to sources, the…
Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile successfully test-fired DRDO has conducted a successful flight test of the…
ED seizes Raj Kundra & Shilpa Shetty's Rs.97.79 cr assets; received bitcoins worth over Rs.150…
Amid gloomy global scenario, India’s economy is buoyed by strong public investment and service sector…
Nestle faces backlash over sugar addition to infant milk in developing countries Food and beverage…
US responds after Elon Musk calls India's exclusion from UNSC 'absurd' Reacting to Tesla CEO…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
it means all the EVMs must be attached with the VVAPT or whatever. We do not have so many VVAPT. hence SREE IYERs suggestion, though good, may not be feasible.
In spite of the fact that a large chunk of Politicians are scum class, we trust them and vote. The politicians, in turn, must learn to trust the system.
We need to ignore the Naidus' and his kind crying foul. The Politicians did not participate when EC called all of them for the PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION. These Politicians are not interested in improving the system. It is only Sour grapes story
How do this 1% difference, manual counting helps? Educate me and enlighten me
If the margin of victory is less than 1%, it makes sense to count all the votes manually in that constituency. Rigging is usually done by manipulating the electronics - a printed receipt cannot be changed. No paper markings allowed. It should be done in front of party agents and should be accepted by all parties.