USA, NATO forces have guts & confidence to confront Putin and Xi Jinping?
A few decades back, the Soviet Union and China claimed that they were the torch bearers of communist philosophy in the world. Both of them declared that they were comrades in arms.
However, with the collapse of the communist movement all over the world due to the inherent weakness and deficiencies, the Soviet Union collapsed as a country and was split into several nations. Today, neither Russia nor any other country belonging to the erstwhile Soviet Union claims to follow communist philosophy and methods. They are all now practicing free enterprise economies with reasonable success.
China too has given up the communist methods for all practical purposes and the Chinese economy today is virtually a capitalist economy with no semblance of communism in any policy of the Government of China. However, unlike the countries belonging to the erstwhile Soviet Union, China continues to claim that it is a communist country, whatever it may mean.
The similarities between Xi Jinping-led China and Putin-led Russia do not end here.
The Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping have declared themselves as life Presidents of their countries. Both of them claim that they have been elected by the people and their term as life President has the approval of the people of their country, which is not true. The fact is that both Putin and Xi Jinping rule their country with iron fist and are virtually merciless dictators, which is evident by the fact that any dissenter in their country would be put down and jailed.
The latest similarity that has now come to the world’s attention is the territorial greed of Putin and Xi Jinping.
A few decades back, China aggressively entered Tibet, massacred the protesting Tibetans, and occupied Tibet and is ruling it with iron curtain now. China did not care about the world’s opinion about its aggressive method in Tibet. The USA and West European countries made much noise against China’s occupation of Tibet but did not do beyond that. The prayers of the Tibetan people for world support to save them from China’s occupation have virtually fallen on dead ears. Even India, which is a victim of China’s aggression, is not supporting the cause of Tibet’s independence, obviously not to displease China. This has made China believe that it can occupy any country’s territory by foul means and other countries would only make noise and then “accept the ground reality”.
Putin is now following the same strategy in Ukraine, as China adopted in Tibet. As usual, the USA and NATO countries are making a lot of noise against Russia’s move to invade Ukraine and are issuing some empty threats such as imposing sanctions against Russia.
Certainly, Xi Jinping in the case of Tibet and Putin in the case of Ukraine is unlikely to be concerned about the threats from USA and NATO countries as both Xi Jinping and Putin are convinced that USA and NATO countries are capable of making only noise and will not go beyond imposing some temporary sanctions that they can manage. Putin knows that other European countries depend on crude oil and natural gas supply from Russia and they would not like their economy to suffer by Russia stopping the supply of crude oil and natural gas.
With the success of China in Tibet and what is clearly seen as the success of Russia in Ukraine, it is amply clear now that China would be emboldened to execute its threat of invading Taiwan, probably soon. Just like Russia occupying Ukraine by virtue of its size and army strength, China too can occupy Taiwan by virtue of its size and army strength very easily. China knows that all other countries would only be fence-sitters and USA and NATO will only react like a paper tiger.
China’s next target would be more territories in India and the South China Sea.
In today’s condition, in the unlikely event of USA and NATO countries involving themselves in military war with Russia, certainly, China will involve itself in support of Russia in one form or the other. In the same way, if in the event of China occupying Taiwan and in the event of USA and NATO countries launching a war against China, Russia would come to China’s help militarily.
The world has not learned a lesson, even after seeing the plight of Tibet at the hands of aggressive China.
Now, China and Russia are the villains of peace in the world and we do not see any Churchill-type leader in USA or Europe to confront Putin and Xi Jinping.
Sadly, United Nations Organizations (UNO) has become an impotent debating forum.
The world should decide that the fight against greedy Putin-led Russia and greedy Xi Jinping-led China should start now with the liberation of Tibet as the starting point. Do USA and NATO forces have the guts and confidence to start such a confrontation against Xi Jinping and Putin?
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
Note:
1. Text in Blue points to additional data on the topic.
2. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.
[…] Get Original Source link Here […]
IMHO, unlike China, Russia is not so much driven by territorial ambitions, at least in the case of Ukraine (though Russia may be happy to get back to the USSR days again, but it knows its limitations). War can never be justified, but Russia has the excuse of acting in self-defence (of its security concerns) in waging war with Ukraine.
Russia gave enough opportunity to Ukraine not to provoke it and move towards becoming a part of NATO. NATO, esp the US and UK, gave Ukraine the false impression of security.
Ukraine is paying the price for trusting NATO, esp the US. The US is increasingly becoming an unreliable ally and is being seen as a toothless tiger.
Ukraine war could well be a turning point in geopolitics. If NATO and the US don’t start acting boldly and show China and Russia their might and resolve, NATO and the US may become increasingly irrelevant. Ukraine war can still be won by NATO if the US and NATO act beyond sanctions and a few arms to Ukraine.