Author Sampath writes about the much-discussed mercy petitions which Savarkar presented to the British authorities to secure release from the Cellular prison.
Author Vikram Sampath’s recently-released biographical work on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar should set to rest many flawed impressions that people entertain about this freedom-fighter and thinker. It is not a hagiographical account, nor does it cover his entire life; Savarkar: Echoes From a Forgotten Past, deals with the period of his life between 1883 and 1924. It would be difficult even for the most ardent critic of the Hindutva icon to fault the author because Sampath delves deep into historical accounts to present a holistic picture of his subject. He does not go overboard in his praise for Savarkar, nor does he condemn Savarkar to sound secular and find a place for himself in the Left-liberal space.
We are introduced to many facets of the man who spent years in the dreaded Cellular Jail in the Andamans, unlike many other freedom-fighters who were fortunate enough to be incarcerated in prisons that offered them various liberties, including home-made food and an environment where they could write best-selling books and frequently meet family, friends and political colleagues. We learn of his sharp intellect on a variety of subjects, including international relations; his poetic abilities; his clarity of thought on the road ahead for a free India; and, how that freedom was to be gained. Having read the book, one comes around to believing that, here was a man whose ideas and philosophy came to define contemporary India in ways that have remained downplayed or worse, ignored in the decades since independence.
The book proceeds to offer graphic accounts of the inhuman conditions that the likes of Savarkar were subjected to in the jail and the fact that most Hindu prisoners were under the charge of Muslim employees who took special delight in torturing and humiliating the inmates.
The book also refers to the feeble attempts that were made by ‘mainstream’ political leaders, especially belonging to the Congress party, to take up Savarkar’s cause. Even Mahatma Gandhi extended just symbolic support to the campaign to get him released. This despite the fact that the entire trail leading to his conviction was a series of “farcical” plays, in the author’s words. As he set sail in a ship bound from Madras to the Andamans, Savarkar noted: “Climbing into that steamer to be transported for life was like putting a live man in his own coffin… if but one a single one out of these my compatriots were to tell me, ‘Go, my brother, go, I and others like me swear that we shall make India free and fulfil your vows’, I would have felt my funeral bier as soft as a bed strewn with flowers.”
In prison, he was sought to be initially befriended by the chief jailor David Barrie, who had heard of his reputation as being an intellectual. The book refers to one of the conversations which demonstrated both Savarkar’s resolve and his deep understanding of global issues. Barrie presented his Irish nationality as an ice-breaker, but Savarkar said, “But I would not have hated you for being an Englishman. I have spent the best years of my life in England and I am an admirer of the virtues that characterise an Englishman.” Barrie then changed track and warned him that “murders are murders and they will bring independence.” Sarkar’s retort stumped the jailor: “Of course I know it, but may I ask you, why don’t you convey this to the Sinfeiners in Ireland? Besides, who told you that I have favoured murders?”
The book proceeds to offer graphic accounts of the inhuman conditions that the likes of Savarkar were subjected to in the jail and the fact that most Hindu prisoners were under the charge of Muslim employees who took special delight in torturing and humiliating the inmates. There were set timings for demands of nature, and if an inmate had an urgent need, he had to relieve himself within his cell. When inmates fell sick from serious ailments, the doctors would give a ‘fit’ certificate so that those jailed could not be excused from the hard labour they were supposed to perform. There is more in the book that would enrage the reader, and leave him wondering how people like Savarkar managed to retain their sanity even after years of living there or did not end up committing suicide.
Barrie was a devil incarnate for the prisoners. When the time came for him to leave, it seemed like the curses of the inmates had had their impact; he was sick to the bone and terrified that he may be killed by some revolutionary once out of the safety of prison walls where he was king. He related his fears to Savarkar who retorted that revolutionaries did not waste their bombs and bullets on crows and sparrows!
While author Sampath does not take a position, he observes that Savarkar should be judged by the yardsticks of his time and the context in which he operated.
Author Sampath writes about the much-discussed mercy petitions which Savarkar presented to the British authorities to secure release from the Cellular prison. He points out that the “process of petitioning the government was a legitimate tool available to political prisoners in British India, similar to defending oneself in court through the agency of a lawyer.” It was not only Savarkar but several inmates at Andaman who petitioned the government for release. The author notes that Savarkar had often expressed an opinion that the primary duty of a revolutionary was to free himself from the clutches of the British in order to return to the freedom struggle. Savarkar had said in of such petitions that, if freed, he would abide by the constitutional process and express loyalty to the English government. This has been seen by his critics as caving in abjectly to the British, and by admirers as a tactical ploy to get out and resume his anti-British fight. While author Sampath does not take a position, he observes that Savarkar should be judged by the yardsticks of his time and the context in which he operated. “Most often, those inimical to Vinayak quote these petitions partially and almost never in a historical and situational context, framing an argument around them to suit a contemporary political narrative which is plainly historically disingenuous.”
Besides, as the author relevantly points out, the British never trusted Savarkar’s loyalty. Perhaps they knew he was feigning. “If he had indeed become their pawn, why did the British treat him with suspicion and as one of India’s most dangerous men for nearly a decade and a half thereafter (after his 1913 petition)?” The fact that his various appeals for release had been rejected have been sought to be brushed aside by his critics. But they contain the most critical information. British authorities refused to release him because he was far too dangerous to be trusted. A senior British official once said, according to the book, “So important a leader is he that the European section of the Indian anarchists would plot for his escape which would before long be organised. If he were allowed outside Cellular Jail in the Andamans, his escape would be certain.”
In any case, it is a matter of history that, on his eventual release, Savarkar hardly retreated to the caves. He continued to oppose the British, rally round the Hindu population against the colonial masters, the appeasement politics of the Congress and the growing belligerence of the Muslim population which had aligned itself with rabble-rousers wanting a separate nation on the basis of Islam. He predicted doom over Mahatma Gandhi’s ill-considered decision to back the Khilafat movement, which was supposed to extend support to Muslims in faraway Turkey to continue having their caliphate. The irony was that Muslims in turkey were fed up with the religious rulers and wanted democracy. Eventually, the Khilafat movement collapsed. Savarkar had termed it an “aafat” (trouble). It neither brought the Muslims closer to the Congress nor did it make Muslims socially more cohesive with the Hindu population. The Mopla massacre in the Malabar, where hundreds of Hindus were butchered and their women raped, effectively ended any pretence that all was well between the two communities.
Vikram Sampath’s book draws its material from archival sources within the country and abroad, some of them are original in nature. No serious understanding of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar can be complete without it.
Note:
1. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.
“Whenever there is threat to the dharma, I become to protect it, O Bharata!”
Dr. Vikram Sampath is the manifestation of prayers of billion hearts, thirsty for the truth. The course has begun.
The MOST FANTASTIC STATEMENT comes now from the Pigsty of Commie and Amra BANGALI loud mouth louts, “SONIA GANDHI fought for Indian independence from Italy”by a beefbrahmin MONKEY pig crossed Ramchander Guha, the Non PhD, HISTORICAL RESEARCHER, who owes his position because of his family women and Nurul Hassan carnal desires
I would like to point out certain facts and to certain factual inaccuracies in the article:
1. Savarkar faced the inhuman conditions for only 6 months or so in the Cellular Jail as he was promoted to be a Jamadar.
2. Most of the Jamadars and the Warders were not Muslims, there were Hindus among them also; most of the inmates were not Hindus, a large number of inmates were Muslims.
3. In 1920 Mahatma Gandhi and other Congress leaders took up the issue of release of ‘all’ political prisoners in Cellular Jail while Savarkar’s petition prayed for release of himself and his elder brother Ganesh.
4. Savarkar himself signed and issued a statement in 1937 that he received a fair trial under the British.
5. Savarkar was in the Cellular Jail for a period of 9 years 10 months only, though his punishment was for 25 years of deportation in two cases which would have run separately, i.e., for 50 years. But he was released even before completion of 10 years. Possibly the longest serving political prisoner in Cellular Jail was Trailokya Maharaj who was there for 30 years and who was highly critical of Savarkar’s behaviour in the jail.
6. After coming out of jail Savarkar never opposed the British rule, rather opposed the Bharat Choro movement and joined hands with the British to help them in the 2nd World War.
7. Savarkar always wanted to be a ‘prominent’ person, but how can he be a prominent person without being anti-British anti-imperialist? So he, like Jinnah chose to become a communalist, though he claimed himself to be an atheist.
8. According to J. L. Kapoor commission’s findings the needle of suspicion in Gandhi assassination case points to Savarkar. So the last phase of his life is not brought into public discourse by Savarkarites.
A bloody Commie Bangad rat ,Kapoor Commission Points to NEHRU, but you bangalis specially the filth that slithered into India in 47 to save you ass are LIE BECAUSE THE BONGS AND PAKIPANJABIS ARE BEST ETERNAL SLAVES OF WHITES WHO WILL LAY A RED ROSE LINED CARPET to any filthy dirty smelly White Old fart to your mother and daughter bedroom for ORGY just to please a WHITE
KAPOOR COMMISSION POINTS DIRECTLY TO NEHRU (THOUGH AS COMMIE YOU MIGHT HAVE READ IT IN RUSSIAN OR CHINESE),
COMMIES SPIED FOR BRITS, CALLED GANDHI IMPERAL NAKED FAKIR, THE IDEA OF PORKISTAN WAS NOT ORIGINALLY JINNAH BUT COMMIE PIG ALLAMA IQBAL, RAN BANGALI BROTHELS FOR ANGLO BRITS SOLDIERS FIGHTING AGAINST NETAJI, SUPPORTED PARTITION, PARTICIPATED IN THE BARBARIC DIRECT ACTION, SUHARWADY MURDERERS WERE LED BY JYOTI BASU (WHY MOST OF COMMIES ARE SUPSICIOUSLY WHITE SKIN, UNKNOWN FREE SEX HOLY WHITE DNA UNKNOWN SPERMFDI), SUPPORTED CHINESE IN 1962, SEND COMMIE WHORES TO SATIATE THEIR CARNAL PLEASURES, TRAITORS OF 1999, SUPPORT PORKISTAN NOW, BDESHI ILLEGALS NOW, BUT WILL REMAIN IN INDIA, BECAUSE EVEN WORSE THAN PIGSHIT FLIES THEY VALUE THEIR SEWER LIVES. COMMIE PARTY IN PAKISTAN LASTED ONLY 2 WEEKS AFTER PARTITION, WHY? DESPITE THE COMMIE PIG (No incult to pigs intended, only comparison, )
BONGS OCCUPIED ALL JOBS IN INDIA WITH HELP OF NEHRU AND BRITS AS THEIR. READ KAPOOR COMMISSION REPORT IN ENGLISH OR SOME OF YOUR LANGUAGE
BY THE WAY NEHRU NEVER BANNED COMMIES BECAUSE OF THE COMMIE-NEHRU- BRIT CONSPIRACY IN S.C BOSE DEATH
1. KAPOOR COMMISSION POINTS THAT 3 DAYS BEFORE THE ASSASINATION, SOMEBODY INFORMED PUNE COLLECTOR ABOUT THE BIG CONSPIRACY OF PLANNED ATTACK ON BRAHMINS SPECIALLY MARATHA BRAHMINS BY CONGI COMMIE DEMONS-RUNNING DOGS OF BRITS, WHITE SUPREMACY AND WHITE BARBARISM ON BRIT ORDERS
2. PUNE COMMISSIONAR INFORMED NEHRU,AND KRISHNA MENON THE COMMIE SEX PIG, IMMEDIATELY, HOWEVER HE SAT ON FILE FOR 3 DAYS..AND GANDHI WAS NOT RUSHED TO HOSPITAL, WHEN NEHRU WAS THERE
3. IN ENSUING RIOTS THE COMMIE PIGS ON VATICAN AND CHURCH ORDERS KILLED 5000 BRAHMINS INCLUDING SAVARKAR BROTHER FAMILY
4. KILLING 3 BIRDS WITH ONE STONE..WHAT NEHRU THE SPY OF BRIT (WHO WITH COMMIES NEVER WENT TO JAIL, BUT COMMIES WERE GOOD IN CLEANING THE BRITISH AND WHITE SHIT POTS BY LICKING), WHAT WAS SIGNED ON AUGUST 14, 1947 BETWEEN NEHRU, BRITS AND JINNAH ONLY THEY WERE PRIVY OF..EVEN NOW ITS A TOP SECRET, GANDHI WAS KEPT OUT OF IT ALSO..BUT IT SEEMS THAT GANDHI CAME TO KNOW SOMETHING OF IT. AS HE IS REPORTED TO HAVE SAID “INDIA SHD BE READY FOR 3RD WAR OF INDEPENDENCE”. WITHIN FEW DAYS GANDHI DIED..AND THE COMMIE PIGS WHO ABUSED GANDHI, NETAJI AND BABASAHAB (HOWEVER NEVER NEHRU) NOW SPEAK IN ANOTHER TONGUE. ANYWAT ITS YOUR BDESHI WHITE ASSLICKING GENES.ALL LIES WITHOUT PROOF.. GANDHI DIED, SAVARKAR FAMILY WAS KILLED AND RSS BLAMED (THE TREACHEROUS TRAITOR COMMIE WERE NOT BANNED–THE CONSPIRACY OF NETAJI)
4. AS ABOUT BOSE KILLING BY COMMIE NEHRU COMBINE
1. LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI WAS MYSTERIOUSLY KILLED BY COMMIE-CONGI conspiracy, BECZ HE WAS BRINGING SOME INFORMATION ABOUT S.C BOSE WHICH WOULD HAVE DESTROYED THE COMMIE CONGIS AND MAYBE THE LONG OVERDUE SUHARTO-FRANCO SOLUTION WOULD HAVE COME
2. CHITTA BASU OF FB WENT TO RUSSIA IN 1996 AND BROUGHT SOME INFORMATION. HOWEVER HE MYSTERIOUSLY WAS KILLED AS SOON AS HE STEPPED IN AMRA BANGALI-COMMIE PIGSTY OF JYOTI BASU THE SUSPICIOUSLY WHITE SKIN PIGSTY. NO ENQUIRY WAS CONDUCTED AND KILLER IS STILL AT LARGE..(MAYBE THE PIG DIED AT 96 YEARS OF AGE)
3. ONE POLICE OFFICER SOME SANYAL ALSO INTIMATED THE PM (THEN HADDI DEVEGOWDA) THAT HE HAS DOCUMENTS IN POSSESION ABOUT NETAJI BEING KILLED BY COMMIE NEGHU CONPSPIRACY , BUT WAS KILLED THAT VERY NIGHT BY UNKNOWN ASSASINS AND THE DOCUMENTS DISAPPEARED FOR EVER. he was of SP rank in Commie pigsty of Bengal, but no enquiry was conducted and nobody caught by the RED KACCHA LOONS
WHERE IS THE PROOF OF SAVARKAR BEING PROMOTED TO JAMADAR, EXCEPT YOUR SHIT SPEWING BONG MOUTH
BHAGAT SINGH WAS HNAGED DUE TO TREACHERY OF A COWARD FROM BENGAL
SAVARKAR WAS A BRAVE MARATHA, NOT FROM A STY WHOSE KING RAN IN FRONT OF MIGHTY ARMY OF 18 MEN OF KAFUR AND HID IN SHIT
COMMIE PIGS AND NEHRU TRAITORS, KILLERS OF SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, L,B SHASTRI, AND 3 MILLION INDIANS DURING PARTITION AND 1 MILLION SINCE JUST TO GET WHITE SPERM FDI..SHUT YOUR MEALY MOUTH..
AND NETAJI WAS A ORIYA AND NOT A COWARD COMMIE BONG
THOSE WHO RAN AND RUN HOUSE BROTHELS FOR HOLY WHITE D..KS LECTURE ON VEER SAVARKAR
Savarkar always wanted to be a ‘prominent’ person, but how can he be a prominent person without being anti-British anti-imperialist? So he, like Jinnah chose to become a communalist, though he claimed himself to be an atheist.
KEEP YOUR BLOODY SECULAR -COMMUNAL TO UR AMRA BANGALI TRIBAL CLOSED ROOM WITH WHITES OR RED PIGS FREE ORGY ROOMS.RUNNING DOGS OF VATICAN AND CHRCH IS WHAT COMMUNISM IS JEBUS VIDE STALIN AND BARBARIAN XTIAN MAO.. HEY SAVARKAR DOES NOT NEED CERTIFICATES FROM THE LOWEST OF LOW LIVES LIKE YOU, FROM THE TRAITORS WHO CALLED BOSE AS DOG OF TOJO, WHO RAN BROTHELS FOR MERCENARY WHITES AGAINST NETAJI.
SAVARKAR A GENETIC NATIVE INDIAN WAS STRONGLY OPPOSED THE SEWER PRD OF 200 YEARS OF WILLING ORGY PRDS OF HOLY WHITE PATERNITY TO TAKE OVER BHARAT SO HE IS VILIFIED, AND THAT TOO BY THE WORST CREED OF SUBHUMANS THE BEEFBRAHMIN COMMIES
TRAITORS AND MASS MURDERERS, JINNAH AND HITLERS IDEOLGICAL GURUS, LECTURING ON SVARAKAR..ONE WHOSE INTELLECT IS PROPORTIONAL TO HOW MANY WHITE SUPREMACIST CONQUISTADOR INQUSITOR ASS HE LICKS.
6. After coming out of jail Savarkar never opposed the British rule, rather opposed the Bharat Choro movement and joined hands with the British to help them in the 2nd World War.
BLOODY FILTHY BLOODED COMMIE LIAR..GIVE THE PROOF. IT WQS THE COMMIES, WHITE DICK PRD BEEFBRAHMIN COMMIE.COMMIES DID IT HE WAS TORTURED COMMIES DAUGHTERS AND MOTHERS SPECIALLY BONGS HAD TORTURED DEBILITATING ORGASMS
THIS IS NOT VEER SAVARKAR BUT THE COMMIE PIGS WITH NEHRU
Forthwith the Communist Party organ Peopleís War
launched a campaign against ëQuit Indiaí proposal of
Mahatma Gandhi. Peopleís War dated July 26, 1942 came
out with an ëOpen Letter to the Working Committee from the
Indian Communistsí. The Letter thundered : ì You have called
upon the British bureaucrats (the British were no more
Imperialist ! ñed.) to go home and leave our country alone.
You plan to launch the traditional type of struggle. The sort of
ëstruggleí Gandhiji is visualising and in which the rest of you
have acquiesced is not a plan of struggle but a gamble; it is not
fighting for freedom but escape into jails ; it is not leading the
people but forsaking them. Such a ëstruggleí will not get us
Freedom but Fascism. î In the same issue P. C. Joshi shed
crocodile tears while writing editorially: ì On our young
shoulders to-day has fallen the great task of upholding the
noble heritage of the Congress. It is the policy of our national
leadership which would break this up and scatter it away. ”
And when the August Revolution broke out, the
Communist Party sided with the British Government of India.
The Peopleís War dated August 16, 1942 boasted ì The
Government of Indiaís Press Communique lifting the ban on
our Party is at once a triumph of the people. The Government is
prepared to give facilities** to the Party to carry out its Policy””
7. Savarkar always wanted to be a ‘prominent’ person, but how can he be a prominent person without being anti-British anti-imperialist? So he, like Jinnah chose to become a communalist, though he claimed himself to be an atheist.
HOW DO YOU KNOW, Mukhopadhyaya became Mukher JEEs because your White Gods could mot pronounce the first, so some worst subhuman ever known to existence the HYBRIDS Beefbrahmins became MukherJEEs so that Njoying Whiite Barbarian does not have difficulty after family has satiated both his fronts and back.
A LOW LIFE FREE SEX PITVIPER FROM FILTHIEST SEWERS OF SEWER OF WORLD BDESH, TRYING TO SPIT.
ON SUN
IF YOU WANT MORE WITH PROOF RATHER THAN UR WHITE ASS LICKING HARANGUE, FOR FEW PEGS OF LIQUOR MIXED WITH ITALIAN PAPPU MUTRA I will give a huge one with proofs, BCZ BASICALLY WE SANGHIS (95% OF INDIA) ARE ALWAYS AND SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE BEEN SONS OF ONE AND TREACEBALE NATIVE INDIAN FATHERS RATHER THAN FIRANGIS (INCLUDING, HYBRIDS, SELF STYLED SECULARS WHOSE EVEN mothers do not know the source of when the poor quality chinese BIRTH CONTROL measure failed. Those who know their mothers but even mothers do not know their father BTW why a Brit THEOLOGY PROF sponsored all education for supsiciously white Prakash karat, and BRENDA KARAT why she hides her fathers name??)
Yes its a war between Native Occupied Indian derisivly called SANGHI and FIRANGI (Including the Bstds of FIRANGIS, and a WANNBE WHITE IS A WORSE BARBRIAN THAN WORST OF CORTESWADIS)
And having read the Book Animal Farm by George Orwell we know that THE ONE WHO FIGHTS FOR INDEPENDENCE is chased out or hounded by the Pig who slept with enemy, but after independence pretend friendship till DOGS FED ON PIG MILK chase the real fighter OUT TO ENSLAVE THE ENTIRE HUMANITY TO WORK FOR COMFORTS OF FEW
And u are one of those Orwellian dogs BETTER GET LOST, and you would be a beggar in some state and NOT IN LUCCHA LAFANGA MOMOTO JIHADI-STALINDOM of WASTE BENGAL
Nehru Gandhi indirectly helped the rulers to murder so many freedom fighters whom they feel as threats, just to save their leadership.
It’s unfortunate that the kind of hardships Veer Savarkar & for that matter entire Savarkar family faced is not known by the present generation.Thanks to “Mahatma” Gandhi & ” Pandit” Nehru,true freedom fighters were pushed to the background. Hope Sampath has brought open the real struggle & unstinted nationalism of revolutionaries like Savarkar.BTW a book by the title”Atmahuti”written by Shivaramu, in Kannada launguage published almost three decades ago candidly portrays the life of Savarkar.
In 1924 Savarkar applied for a government monetary grant for Rs. 100 per month. The government sanctioned Rs. 60 p.m. at that time, but he used to receive the grant for how many years is not in the records.
The crap from a Nehru-Commie Pig killers of Netaji, Savarkar, Mukerjee, Lal Bahadur Shastri, D.D. Upadhyaya, BLOODY LOW LIVES COMMETING ON SAVARKARJI
HI DID NEHRU OR ANY BLOODY COMMIE EVEN GO TO JAIL..AGA KHAN HOUSE ARREST WITH ALL FACILITIES INCLUDING WHORES..NEHRU DIED OF SYPHLIS
WHY M.O MATHAI BOOK IS BANNED IN INDIA AND ALSO RED SARI
GO AND SHOW IT TO ITALIAN DEMONESS, AND HANG AROUND THE WESTERN VATICAN EMBASSIES FOR SOME CRUMBS OF SHIT THROWN AT YOU..TRAITORS COMMENTING ON SAVARKAR..BC TRAITORS WHO POINTED OUT BHAGAT SINGH FOR A CRUMB OF BRIT SHIT (THOUGH SHOT LIKE A MAD DOG)
COMMIE PIG,
https://postcard.news/goons-of-congress-veer-savarkar-had-spent-decades-in-jail-what-about-nehru/
WHICH RECORDS U TALK..I COULD FIND NONE,, MAYBE YOUR FAMILY WOMEN WERE HIRED BY BRITS FOR THIS IN ADDITION TO OTHER PLEASURES..BDESHI LOUT..SHOW UR JADAVPUR GUTTER INTELLECT TO AMRA BANGALI BEGGARS OR COMMIE RUN BRothels
QUOTE FROM YOUR BELOVED HOLY WHITE GOD SOURCES..TWO BIT SUBHUMAN
Communist Party sided with the British Government of India.
The Peopleís War dated August 16, 1942 boasted ì The
Government of Indiaís Press Communique lifting the ban on
our Party is at once a triumph of the people. The Government is
prepared to give facilities** to the Party to carry out its Policy
*An example of Communist casuistry. They identified the struggle of
enslaved nations for freedom with the struggle of the Soviet Union to
avert defeat in a war which she had done her utmost to bring upon
the world, but which also descended on her.
**Meaning police protection against the patriots and ample money
with which the communists could mount propaganda and run their party
brothels for the Anglo-American soldiers.
COMMIE NEHRU BRIT CONSPIRACY IN DEATH OF NETAJI AT HANDS OF STALIN,
https://postcard.news/how-nehru-cheated-netaji-bose/
BETTER LOW BORN LOW LIVES FILTHY TRAITORS NEED NOT LECTURE HERE, COMING AS BEGGARS IN ALL STATES STINKING OF RANCID FISH..BUT YES SHOW IT TO ITALIAN ILLITERATE VATICAN PLANT, MAYBE SOME PIDI OR PAPPU MUTRA WILL BE THROWN AT YOU TRAITOR
AND WHY DID YOU LEAVE OUT THAT NEHRU GOT EDWINA AND MANY OTHERS WHEN THE LAW in white countries was PUBLIC LYNCHING OF ANY NON WHITE EVEN LOOKING AT WHITES..OH BUT A SEWER PRD WANNABE WHITE IS A BIGGER MENGEL THAN ORIGINAL ARE WORST, AND ITS IN YOUR BANGALI GENES
Veer Savarkar was following his thaught inspired by Raja Shivaji Maharaj
[…] post Understanding Savarkar: A look at Vikram Sampath’s book appeared first on […]