Bombay High Court convicts Tarun Tejpal in 2013 rape case, overturns acquittal

    In a major legal development, the Bombay High Court set aside Tarun Tejpal's acquittal and convicted him in the 2013 sexual assault case

    Tarun Tejpal has been convicted by the Bombay High Court in the 2013 rape case, with sentencing to be decided separately
    Tarun Tejpal has been convicted by the Bombay High Court in the 2013 rape case, with sentencing to be decided separately

    Major setback for Tarun Tejpal as Bombay High Court overturns acquittal

    In a landmark verdict, the Bombay High Court on Thursday convicted former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal in the 2013 rape case, overturning a Goa trial court’s 2021 judgment that had acquitted him of all charges. The High Court allowed the Goa government’s appeal and held Tejpal guilty, with the quantum of sentence to be decided separately.

    A division bench of Justice Neela Gokhale and Justice Amit Jamsandekar pronounced the verdict after re-examining the evidence and hearing arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. Tejpal was present in court during the pronouncement of the judgment, in compliance with the court’s earlier direction.

    The case dates back to November 2013, when a junior colleague accused Tejpal of sexually assaulting her inside a hotel elevator during the THINK Fest event in Goa. Following the allegations, Tejpal stepped down as editor of Tehelka and was subsequently arrested after the Goa Police registered a case against him.

    In May 2021, a sessions court in Goa acquitted Tejpal, holding that the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The verdict came under sharp criticism, prompting the Goa government to challenge the acquittal before the Bombay High Court.

    During the appeal, the prosecution argued that the trial court had relied on stereotypes about how a survivor of sexual assault should behave and had overlooked key pieces of evidence, including an apology email allegedly sent by Tejpal to the complainant after the incident. It also contended that the trial court had effectively put the survivor on trial instead of objectively assessing the evidence against the accused.

    Tejpal’s defence maintained that the trial court’s acquittal was based on electronic evidence and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case, arguing that there was no justification to interfere with the earlier verdict.

    Allowing the state’s appeal, the High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted Tejpal. A detailed copy of the judgment is awaited, and the court will hear arguments separately before deciding the sentence to be imposed.

    The verdict marks a significant turn in one of India’s most high-profile sexual assault cases involving a senior media figure, bringing a legal battle that has stretched for nearly 13 years to a decisive stage.

    For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    error: Content is protected !!