Delhi HC asks Waqf Board to file separate plea against Centre’s decision to delist 123 properties

The Waqf Board filed an application challenging the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs' letter

The Waqf Board filed an application challenging the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs' letter
The Waqf Board filed an application challenging the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs' letter

Delhi HC refuses to stay the operation of Centre’s letter absolving Waqf Board from 123 properties

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Delhi Waqf Board to file a different petition challenging the Centre’s decision to absolve the board from all matters related to 123 properties, which have been under dispute for a long time.

A single-judge bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri denied passing an urgent order in an application moved by the Board for a pending petition against the Central Government‘s decision to delist the 123 properties.

The Board had filed a petition last year.

After asking the Board to file a separate petition to challenge the letter, the court listed the application along with the pending petition for the next hearing on August 4.

On February 8, the Waqf Board filed an application challenging the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs’ letter.

Representing the Board, Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra argued that there is no source of power with the Union of India to “absolve” the Board from the above-mentioned properties.

He said: “If you do not have the power, you can’t do anything under the statutory scheme.”

“Since 1911 and thereafter till date, when the letter has come up, these properties are admittedly waqf properties, concerned with the waqf board, to be controlled and managed by the board under the Act (Delhi Waqf Act),” he added.

He stated that according to the complete statutory scheme, there is no concept of the Central or State government to absolve the properties from the Board.

Additional Solicitor General, Chetan Sharma appearing for the Centre submitted that the Board’s prayers in the application are totally beyond the scope of the pending petition.

Sharma cited various orders passed by the court dismissing the Board’s application seeking a stay of the two-member committee — looking into the status of the properties, and a revision plea.

Sharma said: “Once given report of the committee is under challenge, we will meet this. It cannot be done by this application. That is a substantive writ petition.”

[With Inputs from IANS]
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here