Delhi HC rejects AgustaWestland middleman Christian Michel’s plea seeking release from jail

    Court rejects Michel’s challenge to India-UAE extradition treaty, says issues already examined by Supreme Court

    Court rejects Michel’s challenge to India-UAE extradition treaty, says issues already examined by Supreme Court
    Court rejects Michel’s challenge to India-UAE extradition treaty, says issues already examined by Supreme Court

    Delhi HC deals blow to Michel in chopper scam row

    The Delhi High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition by middleman Christian Michel James in the Rs.3,600-crore AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam case seeking his release from jail. A bench of justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja said there was no merit in the petition by the British national, who was extradited from Dubai in December 2018.

    In his petition, James assailed a provision of the India-UAE extradition treaty. He also challenged a trial court order of August 7, 2025, by which his application under Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for his release from jail was rejected. Michel challenged Article 17 of the treaty, signed in 1999, which allows the requesting state (in this case India) to prosecute extradited persons not only for the specific offence for which extradition was done, but also for connected offences. It was contended that an extradited person can be prosecuted only for the offences for which extradition took place, and not for connected offences.

    Michel, in his petition, also submitted that he completed seven years in jail on December 4, 2025, and has, therefore, already undergone the maximum sentence possible for the offences for which he was extradited, rendering his continued detention in India illegal. In its 19-page verdict, the bench stated that it was not permissible for James to re-agitate issues pertaining to the treaty, which, at least on a prima facie basis, have already been considered by the Supreme Court.

    After his extradition, Michel was arrested by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED). He is among the three middlemen being probed in the case, and the other two are Guido Haschke and Carlo Gerosa. He was granted bail by the Supreme Court in the CBI case in February 2025. The high court granted him bail in the ED case in March that year. However, he continues to be in jail as he was unable to fulfil the bail conditions.

    A trial court directed Michel to furnish a personal bond of Rs.5 lakh and a cash surety of the same amount to secure his release in the CBI case. In the ED case, the high court asked him to furnish a personal bond of Rs.5 lakh and a cash surety of Rs.10 lakh. The high court also clarified that Michel could be released without depositing the passport, which had expired immediately. The authorities concerned were asked to deposit the fresh passport, whenever ready, with the trial court directly, it added. The high court also asked the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO) to ensure that James does not leave the country.

    The CBI, in its charge sheet, has said an estimated loss of 398.21 million euros (about Rs.2,666 crore) to the exchequer due to the deal that was signed on February 8, 2010, for the supply of VVIP choppers worth 556.26 million euros. The ED, in its charge sheet filed against Michel in June 2016, alleged that he had received 30 million euros (about Rs.225 crore) from AgustaWestland.

    For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

    We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
    Team PGurus

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    error: Content is protected !!