SC seeks replies from Centre, CBI, ED, Anil Ambani on PIL alleging massive banking, corporate fraud

    The PIL, filed by ex-Union Secretary EAS Sarma, accuses ADAG of systematic fund diversion, shell companies, falsified accounts, and bank collusion

    The PIL, filed by ex-Union Secretary EAS Sarma, accuses ADAG of systematic fund diversion, shell companies, falsified accounts, and bank collusion
    The PIL, filed by ex-Union Secretary EAS Sarma, accuses ADAG of systematic fund diversion, shell companies, falsified accounts, and bank collusion

    SC calls for status reports in PIL alleging Rs.41,000 cr ADAG fraud

    In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Tuesday sought responses from the Centre, CBI, ED, Anil Ambani, and the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (ADAG) on a PIL seeking a court-monitored probe into alleged massive banking and corporate fraud involving the ADAG and its group companies. A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran took note of the submissions made by lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner and former Union Secretary E A S Sarma, and sought the replies within three weeks. The bench posted the PIL for further hearing after three weeks.

    Bhushan argued that the probe agencies are not investigating the alleged complicity of banks and their officials in the huge banking fraud. He sought a direction to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to file respective status reports with regard to the probe against banks and their officials in the case. Bhushan said the instant case is “probably the largest corporate fraud in India’s history”. The FIR was registered in 2025, though the fraud had been going on since 2007-08, the lawyer alleged.

    “We want a status report from the ED and the CBI on what they are investigating. Clearly, they are not probing the collusion by the banks,” said Bhushan, seeking a probe monitored by the apex court. The PIL alleged systematic diversion of public funds, fabrication of financial statements, and institutional complicity across multiple entities of the Anil Ambani-led Reliance ADAG. It said the FIR registered by the CBI on August 21, along with the connected ED proceedings, addresses merely a small segment of the alleged fraud.

    The petition claimed that despite detailed forensic audits flagging serious irregularities, neither agency is probing the role of bank officials, auditors, or regulators, which the petitioner called a “critical failure”. “Issue a Writ of Mandamus… Or direction directing a court-monitored investigation by the CBI and ED to conduct a thorough, impartial, and time-bound investigation into the financial fraud perpetrated by Respondent No. 4 (Anil Ambani) and Respondent No. 5 (ADAG),” the plea said.

    The PIL also sought a direction to the respondents for the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) comprising officers from the CBI and the ED to conduct a “thorough, impartial, and time-bound investigation”. “Issue appropriate writ or direction that the investigation into the affairs of ADAG, its promoters/ directors, and connected entities be monitored by this honourable court, so as to ensure that the probe is fair, independent, comprehensive, and free from any external influence, and that no aspect of the financial or criminal misconduct revealed in the forensic and audit reports is left outside the scope of inquiry,” it said.

    The plea also sought a comprehensive, coordinated, and judicially-supervised probe, asserting that the ongoing investigations by the CBI and the ED were inadequate and “deliberately restricted” to a narrow FIR filed by the State Bank of India (SBI) in August 2025. It said between 2013 and 2017, RCOM, Reliance Infratel (RITL), and Reliance Telecom (RTL) borrowed Rs.31,580 crore from a consortium of banks led by the SBI. The SBI lodged the FIR on August 21, alleging criminal conspiracy, cheating, criminal breach of trust, and misconduct involving an alleged loss of Rs.2,929.05 crore, it said. The plea said the FIR was based on a forensic audit commissioned in 2019, covering suspicious fund flows, diversion of bank loans, fictitious transactions, and the alleged use of shell companies.

    The petition states that only judicial oversight can ensure that a matter involving such extensive public money exposure is thoroughly investigated and that all responsible individuals are held accountable. EAS Sarma was the former Secretary of Expenditure, Economic Affairs, and Power in the Central government and was associated with many public interest litigations.

    For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

    We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
    Team PGurus

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here