How rare earths and Wall Street shocks shaped Trump’s China tariff truce
The sequence of events described—U.S. tariffs, China’s rare earth counter-threats, and the subsequent financial market turmoil—did not happen in a single, clean sweep, but the pattern of escalation followed by de-escalation driven by economic pain is clearly documented. The financial markets played a critical role in forcing both sides toward truces.
1. The Weaponization of Rare Earths
China’s dominance in refining Rare Earth Elements (REEs) provides it with strategic leverage. In response to U.S. tariff hikes (particularly in 2019 and during subsequent escalations), state-run media and officials in China openly threatened to restrict REE exports to the U.S.
Impact: Rare earths are vital components in high-tech industries, including U.S. defense systems (F-35 jets, missiles), medical devices, and clean energy technology. The mere threat of a ban—even before a formal “ban” was fully implemented—sent a clear message that China could inflict severe disruption on America’s most strategically important industries, far beyond consumer goods.
2. The U.S. Treasury market “tailspin”
The financial market reaction to the escalating conflict was dramatic, though the nature of the “tailspin” is nuanced:
- Initial reaction (Flight to Safety): When trade uncertainty peaked following major tariff announcements, investors typically initiated a “flight to safety.” This meant selling off volatile assets (like stocks) and buying stable U.S. Treasury bonds.
- Effect: Increased demand for Treasuries drives their prices up and their yields (interest rates) down. This sharp decline in yields across various maturities signals immense economic anxiety and a high probability of a future recession.
- The volatility: Beyond the classic flight-to-safety, the trade war announcements caused extreme market volatility across all asset classes, including short-term U.S. dollar funding markets. This uncertainty stifled business investment, creating a material headwind for economic growth.
- Significance: While a drop in yields might seem like a positive for government borrowing, the overall market instability—combined with falling stock returns and freezing business investment—was politically and economically damaging.
3. The Need for a “Patch-up”
The combination of the economic cost of tariffs (paid mostly by U.S. importers and consumers) and the financial market uncertainty made a resolution necessary for both countries.
- Pressure point: The market turmoil acted as an economic deadline. Business sentiment plummeted, supply chains fractured, and key economic indicators like manufacturing activity slowed significantly. The financial instability was simply too high a cost to maintain perpetual escalation.
- Outcome: Major de-escalations, such as the Phase One trade deal in January 2020 (which rolled back some tariffs and saw China commit to higher U.S. goods purchases), came directly after periods of maximum financial and strategic tension. These diplomatic patch-ups were largely aimed at restoring market confidence and mitigating the severe economic risk caused by the preceding tit-for-tat actions. The financial stress was thus a powerful, if temporary, force for stabilizing the relationship.
The financial damage and the strategic threats (like rare earths) created a pressure cooker environment, which consistently led to diplomatic truces aimed at calming markets and preventing a deeper, more structural economic crisis.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
