How long can the Digital Renminbi of China be fully convertible into Gold?
The idea of anchoring currency to a tangible asset like gold, like China’s Digital Renminbi, which it says is fully convertible into Gold — a system where money cannot be simply printed—holds strong intuitive appeal, especially in an era of massive government budgets and national debts. However, when juxtaposed with the size and complexity of the $95+ trillion global economy, the gold standard presents three fundamental, insurmountable problems of scale, flexibility, and growth.
1. The insurmountable problem of scale and valuation
The most immediate challenge is the sheer arithmetic of scarcity. The total global money supply (M2, which includes currency and most liquid deposits) is estimated to be over $95 trillion USD. In contrast, the total amount of gold ever mined above ground is finite (around 216,000 tonnes).
To fully back the entire global money supply with gold reserves, the fixed price of gold would have to skyrocket to levels far beyond its current market value, potentially exceeding $7,800 to $16,000 per ounce, depending on how much of the money supply must be backed.
Result: A return to gold would require an astronomical revaluation of the metal, creating unprecedented economic chaos and immediately making countries with small gold reserves unable to participate effectively. A few nations with large reserves would gain immense, disproportionate power.
2. The rigidity constraint and crisis response
The main reason the gold standard was abandoned, first domestically in 1933 and internationally in 1971, was its inherent inflexibility. Modern economies require central banks to manage monetary policy to stabilize the business cycle.
Fighting Recessions: When an economic crisis hits (like the 2008 Financial Crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic), a central bank needs to lower interest rates and inject liquidity (money) into the system to prevent a total collapse. Under a gold standard, this is impossible, as the central bank is legally constrained by its gold reserves.
Deflationary Spiral: Tying the currency to a fixed, slow-growing asset forces the economy into a state of chronic deflation (falling prices) when economic growth outpaces the gold supply. Deflation is highly destructive, as it incentivizes people to hoard cash rather than invest or spend, further slowing the economy. Historically, countries that left the gold standard during the Great Depression recovered faster than those that tried to maintain the peg.
3. Slower growth of gold vs. the modern economy
For a healthy economy to function and grow, the money supply must expand at a rate roughly equal to the growth in the production of goods and services (GDP).
Economic need: Global economic activity generally requires a nominal growth rate of around 6.5% annually.
Gold supply reality: The world’s total gold supply increases at a slow rate of approximately 1.5% to 2% per year (new mining output).
This mismatch is unsustainable. The money supply would constantly fail to keep pace with the growth of trade and production, resulting in a permanent structural constraint on global economic expansion. In a complex, fast-paced, and digitalized world, this rigidity would essentially guarantee recurrent, painful recessions.
In summary, while the fear of excessive money printing is valid, a gold-backed currency provides discipline at the cost of crippling economic flexibility and long-term growth.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
Today’s economy is too vast & cannot be covered by Gold alone. There is no alternative other than endlessly printing currency notes and no one has any control on other country printing it endlessly with duplicate / triplicate…serial numbers….& fake currencies.
A new formula to be invented & USA will never agree unless it has some green shoe option to endlessly print for itself.