My Letter Series – Dear Indians, They Tried Their Darndest, But The Legend Of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Raj Guru Still Lives On

Some lives leave indelible impressions on histories – such as those of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Raj Guru

Some lives leave indelible impressions on histories – such as those of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Raj Guru
Some lives leave indelible impressions on histories – such as those of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Raj Guru

Legendary trio and their martyrdom

Executions, in India, have always been conducted during the early hours of a day. Well, not always! In the case of Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev, the hanging was scheduled to be done on the 24th of March, 1931, at 5.30 AM but, for reasons best known to the British, was moved to 23rd of March, 1931, at 7:30 PM. Were they expecting people to revolt? Possibly, but the fact remains, that 3 of India’s sons were hanged without any qualms. The trio was denied justice. The story of how this unfolded is given in the paragraph below.

It is ASIAD, that in 1919, hours after the Jalianwalah Bagh massacre which left thousands dead, Bhagat Singh, then 12, visited the area along with his father and uncles. This left an indelible mark on his psyche. Following this, was the killing of Lala Lajpat Rai, in 1928, in the city of Lahore, leaving Bhagat Singh feeling helpless and furious. Raised in a Sikh family which had always been a part of the freedom struggle, be it with Maharaja Ranjit Singh, where his grandfather played a role, or with the Ghadar Party, where his two uncles were members, Bhagat Singh had role models to look up to. In retaliation to Lala Lajpat Rai’s killing, Bhagat Singh, Rajguyru and Sukhdev shot and killed John Saunders, the Commissioner of Police. After a brief escape, where Singh cut his hair and shaved his beard, the three unsung freedom fighters were captured.

Rather than asking for clemency for the trio, Gandhi and his cohorts did not bat an eyelid, on that fateful day of the 23rd of March, 1931, when Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev were hanged.

The case was presented before the Lahore Court. The Court was run by the Magistrate, Raisaheb Kishan. The general protocol was if a conviction was gotten, the Right to Appeal was to be granted. In this case, a conviction was gotten and the Right to Appeal was to be administered by the Lahore High Court. The hearing itself went for around 10 months, with an innumerable number of witnesses being provided by both sides. While this was going on, the then Governor-General, Irwin, passed an ordinance, the Lahore Ordinance, that basically stopped these proceedings and moved it to a special tribunal. An unheard-of move, given that these hearings had been going on for 10 months or more. The three judges contained one Indian judge, Agah Haider. The other two were British.

The three entered the Court screaming patriotic slogans, which infuriated the presiding judge, a Britisher, who asked that the police restrain the accused. The police took this as an invitation to beat the protesters, leaving many, if not all, in need of medical assistance. All inside the four walls of the Court. Sick of this abuse of power, Agah Haider resigned from the tribunal. One other person also resigned with Haider, leaving the tribunal, initially of three judges, with Just One Judge, a Britisher who had no qualms in finding Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev, guilty and ordered them to be hanged. Yes, there were two additional judges that were brought in, when the two initial judges resigned. However, they had not heard any of the evidence presented earlier and had to work on what was communicated to them by the leading judge.

Whether, or not, the Indian National Congress (INC) colluded with the British, in this legal miscarriage of gross justice, is up for conjecture. The fact remains that, on the face of it, the trial was one of politically motivated “justice”. The then INC leadership had a chance to set this right. However, a majority of them saw this trio as potential leaders who could take the limelight away from the INC. That Singh would have never agreed to partition was clearly known to his associates and people that knew him well. Would he have objected to the likes of Nehru and his coterie of advisors being “Leaders” to a population that wanted to get out of the clutches of the British Empire? Most vehemently, no doubt! Would this have suited a party that was, by all indications, an extension of the Raj? No, as events would demonstrate. Please do note, even Jinnah is supposed to have said, “I don’t condone their methods but completely understand their rationale behind this”, talking about Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev.

Rather than asking for clemency for the trio, Gandhi and his cohorts did not bat an eyelid, on that fateful day of the 23rd of March, 1931, when Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev were hanged. To all, this will always remain a blot on this party, which for all purposes was an Indian wing to the British Raj. As the old textbooks, from the 60s and 70s, will reveal, the trio of Singh, Guru and Sukhdev never was once mentioned. Gandhi, in his writings in Young India, states, “I could have made commutation a term of the settlement. However, it could not be made, as the working committee (Kumar’s thoughts: I am assuming Gandhi meant the Congress Working Committee) had told me to not make commutation a condition to anything.” Does this sound like Gandhi and his cohorts didn’t really want the trio to live? You bet! He was quoted as saying, “If the boys are to be hanged, let them be hanged before the Karachi Congress meeting.”

It is alleged that Gandhi did write to the Governor-General on the 23rd of March, 1931, seeing whether this sentence could be changed to life in prison. However, that letter would probably have reached the intended person late enough for the hangings to have couldn’t be stopped. For those who helped build the Gandhi Temple in Pedakaparthi, Telangana (apparently the man performs miracles to those that believe in him! More of that in my future article), Gandhi was not without greed! He wanted the country to buy into his philosophy of pacifism! Any opposition to that was not tolerated! So much for the divinity, tolerance and pacifism, he preached to others!

Whatever the feelings may be about shooting John Saunders, the fact remains that most, if not all, members of the “esteemed” Indian National Congress were scared of the ramifications, their opposition to the hangings may have. Ramifications not towards India gaining independence, Bose had already guaranteed that, but ramifications on who would be the Prime Minister. Bose was a fan of Bhagat Singh.

In his musings, Singh had said “My life has been dedicated to the noblest cause, that for the freedom of this country. Therefore, there is no rest or worldly desire that can lure me.” Does this sound like someone that wanted to be a “part of the Nehru Power Grab?” Not at all. In fact, he would have been happy just being on the sidelines, watching India prosper. He’s sitting up there in the sky, probably smiling at India’s emergence as a world leader.

To those that put him down, all I can say is, whoever is trying to bring Bhagat Singh, Raj Guru and Sukhdev down, is already far below that trio.

जय श्रीराम। जय सीयाराम। उत्तिष्ठ भारत। जय माँ भारती

God bless the USA!

1. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.

Kumar Sridhar is a full time IT professional who is also a blogger,columnist and an avid sports fan! He lives with his family in New Jersey, USA.
Kumar Sridhar


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here