
हाल ही में संपन्न उत्तर प्रदेश चुनावों में अखिलेश यादव ने प्रधान मंत्री मोदी को गुजरात के गधे कह कर वर्णित किया था | आप को तो पता है के बॉलीवुड एक्टर अमिताभ बच्चन गुजरात के ब्रांड ambassador हैं | यह एक काल्पनिक बातचीत है |
Latest posts by Team PGurus (see all)
- Xi, Trump meet: What was agreed to and confirmed by both sides? - November 2, 2025
- How much is it costing the US taxpayer to deport the illegal immigrants and where are they being sent to, if the host country refuses to take them in? - November 2, 2025
- Hoardings in villages barring entry to pastors, converted Christians, not unconstitutional: Chhattisgarh HC - November 2, 2025










The cartoon voice talk bubble thingy, “गधे से गधा मिले तो मिल गये दो लात” is simply not correct; instead, is funny and comic in itself. “गधे से गधा मिले तो मिल गयीं (better: गईं) दो लातें” is appropriate. Kindly let me point out that ‘लात’ is a singular, feminine (gender) noun, whose plural form is लातें. ‘मिल गये दो लात’ wrongly presumes ‘लात’ to be a masculine noun (unaltered whether singular or plural). Moreover, ‘गधा’, being singular and masculine, should lead to “गधे से गधा मिला तो मिल गयीं दो लातें”; however, “गधे से गधा मिले तो मिल गयीं (better: गईं) दो लातें”, too, is alright but only if the ‘मिले’ implies ‘मिला’ in the subjunctive (= if) mood. Luckily, the situation here involves an intransitive verb (= अकर्मक क्रिया) like ‘मिला’; where there is a transitive verb (= सकर्मक क्रिया) like, say, ‘गाया’, the verb takes the gender of the OBJECT, and a ‘ने’ appears immediately after the SUBJECT, eg, ‘नर्मदा ने गाना गाया’.