Adani-Hindenburg row: Plea in SC seeks contempt action against SEBI

PIL petitioner Vishal Tiwari has filed an application saying the SEBI has failed to submit its final report despite the deadline given to it by the court

PIL petitioner Vishal Tiwari has filed an application saying the SEBI has failed to submit its final report despite the deadline given to it by the court
PIL petitioner Vishal Tiwari has filed an application saying the SEBI has failed to submit its final report despite the deadline given to it by the court

SEBI faces contempt plea for delaying investigation Adani-Hindenburg inquiry

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court for initiation of contempt proceedings against the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), accusing it has violated the timeline for completing the investigation and submitting its report on the allegations of stock price manipulation by the Adani Group, headed by Industrialist Gautam Adani, who bagged plum contracts during Prime Minister Narendra Modi regime.

An application has been filed by PIL petitioner Vishal Tiwari saying that despite the deadline given to the SEBI it has failed to comply with the direction of the court and has not submitted the final conclusion/ report as was directed by the court. The petition said by the order dated May 17, 2023, the apex court directed SEBI to submit its report till August 14, 2023. It said on August 25, 2023, SEBI filed the status report regarding its investigation stating that overall it has done 24 investigations, out of which 22 investigations have achieved finality and two are of interim nature.

The application also referred to the latest report by the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) against the Adani Group and its alleged investments via “opaque” Mauritius funds, mostly routed by Gautam Adani’s brother Shantilal Adani, who has citizenship in tax haven country Cyprus and resident in Dubai.

The application said that the primary focus of the PIL was on what steps shall be taken in the future to strengthen the regulatory system so that the investors could be protected and their investment in the share market remains safe. “Because after the publication of the Hindenburg report against the Adani Group …. Thousands of crores of the investors‘ money got lost.

“But now the question arises, whether the present regulatory authority is efficient enough or if some changes are required by setting up a new regulatory body with a more efficient mechanism so that in future such damaging incidents may not occur in the share market and the investors’ money may be protected,” it said.

Tiwari in his application said that a strong mechanism is also required to keep vigil upon the companies’ conduct and practices – whether they are complying with necessary rules and regulations laid down by the regulatory authority. “That till now after the recommendations and suggestions given by the expert committee in its report the Union Government (India) has not taken any strong step in compliance of that and has not apprised the court with any secured framework for the protection of investors in future,” it said. Tiwari said that SEBI in its application has objected to the suggestion of a necessary timeline for the completion of the investigation.

“The SEBI objection is contrary to the present need for a strong and efficient regulatory mechanism because timeless investigations lead to the disappearance of evidence and vital information against any entity which is under investigation and it also reduces the confidence of the investors in the market,” it said, adding that SEBI failed to file its report despite timeline fixed by the court till August 14.

“The inordinate delay in investigation impacts upon investigation and it also raises suspicion in the minds of investors and refrains them from investing in future. Delay in the investigation also leads to the manipulations and damage of vital material and evidence,” it said. The application said that the expert committee constituted by this court is still working on the present matter and has not been discharged.

“As the issue has again risen by the new disclosures and report of Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) against Adani Group, the need has arisen to get it investigated by the independent body which was constituted by this court,” the application said. It said an explanation should be sought from SEBI for not complying with the timeline framed by this court in the order dated May 17, 2023, for completing the investigation and submitting a report.

On November 6, the top court said the apex court registry would look into the issue of listing for hearing PILs related to allegations of stock price manipulation by the Adani Group. On July 11, the top court asked the SEBI about the status of its ongoing investigation into the allegations of stock price manipulation by the Adani Group. The Supreme Court of India, which had granted time till August 14 for a probe by the SEBI, had said the inquiry has to be concluded expeditiously.

Later, the capital markets regulator filed a status report on the Adani-Hindenburg probe and said it was awaiting information from tax havens. The SEBI, in its report, had said that it has completed the probe in all but two allegations against the Adani Group and is still awaiting information from five tax havens on actual owners behind foreign investors investing in the conglomerate. The report said out of the 24 matters it was probing, findings in as many as 22 are final.

Without divulging the outcome of its investigations, the SEBI had given a detailed breakdown of the steps taken by it during its probe, including related party transactions. “SEBI shall take appropriate action based on the outcome of the investigations in accordance with law,” the regulator had said.

The probe reports finalized include allegations of manipulation of stock prices, alleged failure to disclose transactions with related parties, and possible violation of insider trading in some of the group stocks.

On May 17, the apex court granted SEBI time till August 14 to complete its probe into the allegations of stock price manipulation by the Adani Group. A Supreme Court-appointed expert committee had in an interim report in May stated that it saw “no evident pattern of manipulation” in billionaire Gautam Adani’s companies and there was no regulatory failure. It, however, cited several amendments the SEBI made between 2014 and 2019 that constrained the regulator’s ability to investigate, and its probe into alleged violations in money flows from offshore entities has “drawn a blank”.

The apex court had on May 17 directed that copies of the report submitted before it by the top court-appointed Justice (retd) A M Sapre expert committee be made available to the parties to enable them to assist it in further deliberations in the matter. Adani Group stocks had been nosedived on the bourses after Hindenburg Research made a litany of allegations, including those about fraudulent transactions and share-price manipulation, against the business conglomerate.

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
Team PGurus


  1. Proxy fighting getting extended & Supreme Court should cease to be the fulcrum to such political fights. Let market forces decide on it.

  2. An organization that can only issue instructions with no implementation mechanism of its own can be effective with only very high and impeccable moral standards. The moral authority gets eroded under its own performance when perceived as not fair, not responsible, opaque in use of discretion, not setting and adhering to time lines while expecting them from others and often not looking beyond serving a tenure. Continuous sermons, observations, cryptic comments and even insulting language do not enhance the respect expected to be commanded. Any attempt at demanding respect never succeeds, but still insisting on it is sheer arrogance.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here