Delhi Court puts DCW chief Swati Maliwal on trial over strong suspicion of “corruption”
After a Delhi Court framed corruption and criminal conspiracy charges against Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) Chairperson Swati Maliwal, Delhi BJP MP Parvesh Sahib Singh Verma wrote a letter to Delhi Lieutenant Governor V K Saxena in this regard and sought her removal as the Chairperson of DCW.
Delhi court had framed charges against Swati Maliwal and three others for allegedly misusing their official position and gaining monetary benefits by illegally appointing people, including Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) workers, in the women’s rights body between August 6, 2015, to August 1, 2016.
The case was registered after BJP leader and former chairperson of DCW Barkha Shukla Singh filed a complaint to Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) in 2016.
BJP MP Verma said, “I have written to the L-G to remove Swati Maliwal from the post.” Misuse of power has become a common thing for the Aam Aadmi Party’s Delhi government. There is rigging in every department. Yesterday, the court ordered to the registration of the case against Swati Maliwal”.
He further said, “AAP leader and chairperson of the Delhi Women’s Commission has charges of misusing her position and recruiting volunteers of the AAP party to the commission ignoring rules. The Kejriwal government is creating new chapters of corruption every day.”
Special Judge Dig Vinay Singh of Rouse Avenue Court framed charges against Maliwal, Promila Gupta, Sarika Chaudhary, and Farheen Malick for criminal conspiracy under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and for other offences under sections 13(1)(d), 13(1)(2) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act.
“The above-mentioned facts do create a strong suspicion that recruitments to various posts were made during the impugned tenure of the accused persons for different remunerations in an arbitrary manner, violating all Rules & Regulations in which the near & dear ones were appointed and remunerations were given to them from public exchequer,” the court said.
“The discussion as above also prima facie indicates that most of the appointments were given to the near & dear ones of the accused persons/ AAP party. Thus, it cannot be claimed by the accused persons that they did not abuse their position in order to obtain pecuniary advantages for other persons i.e. the persons so appointed, or that prima facie there was no dishonest intention,” the court added.
It has been claimed by the prosecution that by appointing AAP workers and acquaintances to different posts of DCW without following due process, it has violated the legitimate right of deserving candidates.
“Promoting the interest of near & dear ones and nepotism, as revealed from the facts of this case, is also a form of corruption,” Justice Singh said.
Between August 6, 2015, and August 1, 2016, 87 appointments – at least 20 persons were associated with AAP – were made in DCW out of which 71 persons were appointed on a contractual basis and 16 persons were appointed for ‘Dial 181‘, the prosecution claimed.
The court said that the prima facie charge under section 13(1)(d) of the PC Act would still be made out against the accused persons as it receives funds from the government even if assuming that DCW is an autonomous body.
[With Inputs from IANS]
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- TN: ED questions five district collectors in illegal sand mining case - April 25, 2024
- ECI issues show cause notice over alleged MCC violations by PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi; seeks response from BJP, Congress chief - April 25, 2024
- Will make India our global export hub: Hyundai Motor Group chief - April 25, 2024
