‘Don’t waste our time’: CJI Surya Kant refuses urgent hearing on plea over police action

    The Supreme Court declined to urgently hear a petition challenging alleged police action against protesters, with Chief Justice of India Surya Kant asking the petitioner not to "waste our time" and directing the matter to follow the regular listing process

    The Supreme Court declined to urgently hear a plea alleging excessive police action, directing that the matter proceed through the regular judicial process
    The Supreme Court declined to urgently hear a plea alleging excessive police action, directing that the matter proceed through the regular judicial process

    SC refused to urgently list a petition alleging police excesses during protests, with CJI Surya Kant making a sharp observation during the hearing

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to grant an urgent hearing on a petition challenging the alleged use of force by police against protesters during a recent demonstration in the national capital, with Chief Justice of India Surya Kant making a sharp observation during the proceedings.

    When the petitioner’s counsel sought immediate intervention, the Chief Justice remarked, “Don’t waste our time, and don’t waste your time,” indicating that the court was not inclined to treat the matter as one requiring urgent listing.

    The lawyer argued that videos circulating from the protest site showed instances of alleged police excesses and urged the court to examine the footage. However, the bench declined the request, with the Chief Justice responding that the court was “not interested in videos” and did not have the time to watch them during the mentioning stage.

    The petition relates to allegations of excessive police action during a protest over examination-related issues. The petitioner sought immediate judicial intervention, claiming that protesters’ constitutional rights had been violated.

    The Supreme Court, however, chose not to entertain the plea on an urgent basis, making it clear that the matter would be considered through the normal judicial process rather than being accorded priority. The court did not express any opinion on the merits of the allegations while declining urgent listing.

    The development comes amid continuing legal and political debate over the handling of recent protests in Delhi, with multiple petitions and representations being filed before courts over the police response.

    For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    error: Content is protected !!