
US House passes Laken Riley Act: Tougher stance on immigration enforcement
The US House of Representatives passed the Laken Riley Act on Wednesday, mandating the detention of unauthorized immigrants accused of theft or violent crimes. The legislation aligns with former President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown policies and is named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered by a Venezuelan national. The bill, representing a significant shift in immigration enforcement, passed with bipartisan support, securing a 263-156 vote, including 46 votes from Democrats.
Key provisions of the Laken Riley Act
The legislation introduces stricter measures to address crimes involving unauthorized immigrants:
- Mandatory Detention: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is required to detain migrants charged with crimes like shoplifting or assaulting a police officer.
- State Authority: The act allows state attorneys general to sue the federal government for damages caused by immigration decisions.
However, critics argue that the bill’s effectiveness is compromised by inadequate funding. The Department of Homeland Security estimates that implementation will cost $26.9 billion, including expenses to expand detention facilities.
Concerns raised by opponents
Opponents, including Democratic lawmakers, have raised several concerns:
- Due Process Violations: There are fears of violations, particularly for minors and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients.
- Overreach on Minor Offences: Critics argue the bill disproportionately targets lesser offenses, such as shoplifting, compared to violent crimes.
- Potential Overburdening of ICE: The legislation risks overwhelming ICE resources without addressing systemic immigration policy issues.
Political and financial implications
The passage of the Laken Riley Act reflects the Republican-led Congress’s focus on stricter immigration enforcement. In addition to this legislation, Republican leaders are working to secure funding for Trump-era border security priorities, with estimated costs of around $100 billion. Former President Trump has proposed using military resources for mass deportations, which would require extensive logistical support, including additional immigration judges and staff.
Supporters argue the act is a vital tool for reducing criminal activity by unauthorized immigrants. Conversely, opponents point to studies indicating that immigrants commit fewer crimes than US-born citizens, questioning the necessity of such measures.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- UK Labour government launches Trump-style immigration crackdown - February 11, 2025
- US lawmakers urge Attorney General to probe Biden DOJ’s indictment of Adani Group officials - February 11, 2025
- ‘All hell’ will break lose: Trump warns of chaos if Hamas fails to release Gaza hostages - February 11, 2025