Latest posts by Sahil Mishra (see all)
- It’s the size of the fight in the dog, not the size of the dog in the fight, that matters - November 8, 2024
- Priyanka Gandhi leaves out critical details in her nomination – what’s next? - October 24, 2024
- Justin’s political career without Jagmeet is just a Dustbin! - October 17, 2024
Mr. Iyer : I found this interview to be below par. It was so informal that it sounded like a chat at Saravana Bhaven at 4PM over a plate of bajjis and Kapi.
I think a little more formal presentation would enhance the value and appeal of such interviews.
Sir – Temples are meant for Hindu devotees and political leaders should not be taken to temples. If you take a foreign dignitary to a temple, in addition to it being against our’s and their customs, it will inconvenience the devotees who are there during that time. Also, there will be interference in temple practices for the dignitary’s safety/protection.
What a waste of an interview . Quitting at 17 minutes. Boring
Fantastic discussion.
Regarding Sabarimala, Prof RV’s comments can be taken as Veda Vakya.
Sree ji, whenever your discussion is with RV, the video is a sure blockbuster, informative and thoroughly enjoyable. Excellent efforts, keep going.
Gems of RV:
——————-
# moolavar to urchavar == sacred to secular
# modern sanyasis == (urchavar going all over the world)
# SC ‘wisdom’ (on interpretation)
# half drawer to full pant == traditionalists to modernists
# dowry law and practices (Indian system of law and traditional practices coexisting)
# modernisms to come from within society, not to be imposed
# diversity is not discrimination
# don’t thrust your mutton on my mouth
# much more than coexistence is acceptance