The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) seems to have forgotten its intended purpose – a voice for the shareholders, to ensure that their best interests are served. Time and again, the slowness with which SEBI acts, if at all is glacial. This gives ample time for the perpetrators to hide their trail, obfuscate the malfeasance and take recourse to the courts and tribunals. By the time the highest court rules, decades go by and the white-collar crime is forgotten and the proceeds long digested. The recent decision to allow IndiaInfoLine (IIFL) to do an Unsecured Bond Sale of Rs.2000 crores on the unsuspecting Indian public is shocking. SEBI is looking the other way on this despite specific instructions from Mumbai’s Economic Offence Wing (EOW), Serious Frauds Investigation Office (SFIO) to declare IIFL as not fit and proper for its role in the NSEL scam.
Think about this – Every HNI that I know will squeeze water from rocks before making even a paisa of investment. What is so attractive about this offering that is making HNIs salivate?
Sale of Bonds still going on?
An unsecured Non-Convertible Debenture (NCD) of Rs.2,000 crores was initiated by IIFL on Jan 22nd. A People Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Madras High Court urging the court to stop this by an IIFL shareholder on Jan 25th. Despite this, the sale proceeded. When there are so many question marks against this brokerage, why is SEBI not stepping in? The bond sale will be on till Feb 20th and before you know it, another financial scam could be forming right under our noses. The company has raised approx. Rs.1229 crores (see Figure 1).
Has the NCD offer been closed?
IIFL can explain if they have closed their offering or have the investors lost interest, as the activity seems to have died down in this offering. SEBI should come out with a Press Release and state their stand on this issue:
- A quick look at the figure below reveals that out of the Rs.1229 crores collected thus far, about Rs.875 crores appears to be by High Net worth individuals (HNI) and Retail. Think about this – Every HNI that I know will squeeze water from rocks before making even a paisa of investment. What is so attractive about this offering that is making HNIs salivate? For a possible answer, read on…
Three Show-Cause notices
Three show cause notices. That is all the SEBI has managed thus far in dealing with the brokers associated with the National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) crisis, one of which is IIFL. That there is something fishy was known almost five years ago, when the EOW, after interrogating borrowers of the crisis-ridden National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) and attaching properties valued at about Rs 4,300 crores, threatened to freeze the properties of the exchange’s brokers.
“Brokers’ assets can also be frozen in this case, if required,” said a senior EOW official, adding while interrogating brokers, the Securities and Exchange Board of India would be informed if required, as many brokers were regulated by the capital market regulator. This was published in the Business Standard of Jan 16, 2014. It gets more interesting. Look at the following graphic:
A quick search for the same post online shows a slightly modified version, with the name of IIFL removed! What you are seeing is an attempt to sanitize a name so it won’t show up, should an investor take the trouble of doing due diligence. But the proof is in print and SEBI knows it. Yet it keeps silent.
SEBI cannot run away from its responsibilities – it must remember that it is solely for the shareholders and not vested interests. The list of cases on which SEBI has not acted is long – NDTV, Tata Sons come to mind. This is no way for the sole regulatory agency to perform.
Mumbai’s Economic Offence Wing (EOW) recommendations, Serious Frauds Investigation Office (SFIO) findings have, after extensive investigations written to the SEBI to call brokers such as IIFL not fit and proper. SEBI could have halted the IIFL issue until the court decides on the PIL matter. What is the rush? It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out the reason. Hint: It is a mega event about to descend on the Indian public.
In conclusion, just as SEBI ordered ICICI Mutual Fund to return Rs.240 crores invested in I-Sec IPO, it should follow suit and order IIFL to return the money collected thus far because this deal stinks just as bad.
 EOW files second chargesheet in the NSEL case against 63 entities – Dec 28, 2018, Livemint.com
 IIFL taps Rs.2,000 crore NCD issue to diversify fund sources – Jan 22, 2019, Economic Times
 Swamy slams SEBI Chairman for not acting on complaints of insider trading against Tata companies – Oct 11, 2017, PGurus.com
 SEBI orders ICICI MF to return Rs.240 crores invested in I-SEC IPO – Jul 3, 2018, Economic Times
- Indian Parliament’s Special Session is convened to mark the shifting to new Parliament building - September 3, 2023
- Why did Rajat Sharma of India TV not declare that Adani owns more than 16% shares in his channel? - January 29, 2023
- Prannoy Roy to get Rs.605 crore from Adani as per Stock Exchange filing. Why is Income Tax not acting on Roys’ dues of over Rs.800 crore? - January 4, 2023