Home Business Banking Supreme Court flags ‘deep-rooted nexus’ between banks, asset reconstruction companies, borrowers over...

Supreme Court flags ‘deep-rooted nexus’ between banks, asset reconstruction companies, borrowers over loans

The SC sought responses from the Centre and RBI after raising concerns over alleged collusion between banks, asset reconstruction companies and borrowers

The SC sought responses from the Centre and RBI after raising concerns over alleged collusion between banks, asset reconstruction companies and borrowers
The SC sought responses from the Centre and RBI after raising concerns over alleged collusion between banks, asset reconstruction companies and borrowers

SC questions Rs.1,537 cr loan settlement over Rs.73.5 cr recovery

Flagging a deep-rooted nexus between banks, asset reconstruction companies, and borrowers, the Supreme Court on Friday said that taxpayers’ money being given as loans and then no effective efforts were taken to recover the amount was not acceptable. A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V Mohana said it was only concerned about the misutilisation of public money, which should have been spent for the welfare of people.

The top court issued notice to the Centre, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and others seeking their responses on a plea which alleged that a debt of Rs.1,537 crore owed to public sector banks was settled through two asset reconstruction companies (ARCs) for a mere Rs.73.50 crore. During the hearing, the bench raised concerns over the manner in which stressed loans were being settled. “This is a deep-rooted nexus between the borrowers, ARCs, and banks,” the bench said.

The apex court observed that it was aware of the limitation in entering into the arena of commercial wisdom of the banks. “But if this is the commercial wisdom that you collect taxpayers’ money, public money, and you recklessly release it and give loans, and then you don’t make any effort or try to recover it, this kind of conduct is not acceptable,” the bench observed.

Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, who appeared for the petitioners, said huge loan amounts were being transferred at a discount, which causes significant loss to the exchequer. “This is not a single case. I am saying it is a tip of the iceberg,” Upadhyay said, adding that the petitioners were seeking a probe into this nexus between the banks, ARCs, and borrowers. The bench also observed that there was a dire need to look into the functioning of the ARCs. It posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.

The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, has sought a probe into the alleged banking fraud involving ARCs, public sector banks, and a Noida-based infrastructure firm. It has sought a direction to the Centre “to constitute a judicial commission or an expert committee including officers of the RBI, SEBI, Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), ED, and the CBI to investigate the corporate and banking fraud facilitated by the asset reconstruction companies (ARCs)”.

According to the plea, the infrastructure firm obtained loans worth approximately Rs.912 crore from a consortium of seven banks led by the State Bank of India (SBI) between 2012 and 2015. It is alleged that a forensic audit conducted in 2018 found evidence suggesting that more than Rs.902 crore had been diverted through shell companies, non-existent vendors, undisclosed bank accounts, and suspected fraudulent transactions. The plea, filed by Muzaffarnagar-based Prateeksha and two others, sought a probe into the alleged banking fraud facilitated by the ARCs.

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
Team PGurus

1 COMMENT

  1. The short fall in the asset reconstruction outcome when the funds are seen to be dirvited should be made up by jail time by both borrowers and lenders.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

error: Content is protected !!