It is against them (Hindu and Sikh refugees from West Pakistan) that all the Kashmiri parties, without any exception, have joined hands to oppose the decision on issuing even “identity cards” to them.
Then there are refugees from Pakistan-occupied-Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) and the then Pakistan. They migrated to Jammu in 1947 in the wake of the communal partition of India to escape the wrath of protagonists of the atrocious two-nation theory. Those who migrated from PoJK are Permanent Residents of Jammu & Kashmir, as they migrated from the areas which were part of the Princely State of Jammu & Kashmir as it existed on August 15, 1947, when India was partitioned to fulfil the urge of Mohammad Ali Jinnah and other Muslim Leaguers. They exercise all the rights which are available under the Jammu & Kashmir Constitution of India. Their three fundamental demands are (1) proper rehabilitation, (2) adequate compensation for the properties they left behind in areas like Muzaffarabad, Poonch, Bagh, Mirpur and Kotli, and (3) abolition of the Evacuee Property Act.
It is the Hindu and Sikh refugees from Sialkot, Sakargarh and the adjoining areas of the then West Pakistan who have been moving heaven and earth since 1947 to obtain their natural rights, including the right to dignified life, right to property, right to jobs under Jammu & Kashmir Government, right to bank loans and right to participate in the Assembly and Local Bodies’ elections in Jammu & Kashmir. It is against them that all the Kashmiri parties, without any exception, have joined hands to oppose the decision on issuing even “identity cards” to them.
These hapless and abandoned refugees have held numerous demonstrations in Jammu and Delhi, organised long marches, courted arrest and exhausted all constitutional methods of agitation to obtain citizenship rights. Faced with official apathy, they even approached the Supreme Court in 1982, but failed to obtain justice because Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution. Disposing of the Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7698 of 1982 on February 20, 1987, the Supreme Court said it was “unable to give any relief to the petitioner”.
hough the Supreme Court did not give any relief to the petitioner, it did suggest ways and means of redressing the grievances of the refugees, but with no result. Neither the State nor the Union Government thought it advisable to act on the suggestions as contained in the judgement for obvious reasons, the most important being the oft-repeated argument of Kashmiri leadership that granting citizenship rights to the refugees would mean a change in the state’s demographic profile, erosion of its autonomous status and alienation of Kashmiri Muslims from India. Expectedly, the Union Government sided with the Kashmiri leadership overlooking the human angle. That attitude persists even today.
The operative part of the judgement reads:
In view of the peculiar constitutional position obtaining in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, we do not see what possible relief we can give to the petitioner and those situated like him. All that we can say is that the position of the petitioner and those like him is anomalous and it is up to the legislature of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to take action to amend legislations such as the Jammu and Kashmir Representative of the People Act, 1957, the Land Alienation Act, the Village Panchayat Act, etc so as to make persons like the petitioner who have migrated from West Pakistan in 1947 and who have settled down in the State of Jammu and Kashmir since then, eligible to be included in the electoral roll, to acquire land, to be elected to the panchayats, etc etc. This can be done by suitably amending the legislations without having to amend the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution.
The operative part further reads:
The petitioners have a justifiable grievance. Surely they are entitled to expect to be protected by the State of Jammu and Kashmir. In the peculiar context of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, the Union of India also owes an obligation to make some provisions for the advancement of the cultural, economic and educational rights of these persons. We do hope that the claims of the persons like the petitioner (Bachan Lal) and others to exercise greater rights of citizenship will receive due consideration from the Union of India and the State of Jammu and Kashmir. We are, however, unable to give any relief to the petitioner.
It is hoped the Government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi would undo the past wrongs and grant citizenship rights to the refugees from West Pakistan.
It may appear unbelievable, but it is a fact that the Sheikh Abdullah-led Government in the state granted citizenship rights to numerous Uyghur Muslim families in 1952 and settled them in the Eidgah area of Srinagar with full citizenship rights. The Uyghur Muslims migrated from Xinjiang province of China to escape Communist Beijing’s wrath.
Similarly, the Government of Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad, which replaced the Sheikh Abdullah Government in August 1953, also accorded similar treatment to the Tibetan Muslims who migrated to Kashmir in 1959 in the wake of the Chinese annexation of Tibet. They were also settled in the same locality with full citizenship rights. Tibet’s leader, the 14th Dalai Lama, along with thousands of Tibetans, also migrated to India in 1959.
It is hoped the Government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi would undo the past wrongs and grant citizenship rights to the refugees from West Pakistan. The 2014 BJP Vision Document for Jammu & Kashmir unambiguously says that “the BJP, if voted to power in the state, shall grant all citizenship rights to them”.
Latest posts by Hari Om Mahajan (see all)
- BJP must contest Parliamentary by-polls in Kashmir - March 19, 2017
- Tunnel on Mughal Road will endanger national security and erode Jammu identity - March 11, 2017
- Move to settle Kashmiri Muslims in Jammu is fraught with dangerous ramifications - March 5, 2017