Adani row: Apex Court demands ‘full transparency’
In a big setback to the government, the Supreme Court on Friday refused to accept in a sealed cover the Centre’s suggestion on a proposed panel of experts for strengthening regulatory measures for stock markets in the wake of the recent Adani Group shares crash triggered by Hindenburg Research’s fraud allegations. Observing that it wanted “full transparency for the protection of investors”, the top court also ruled out the possibility of any sitting judge overseeing the functioning of the proposed panel.
Two intentions in mind
“We are closing it for orders,” said the bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud after hearing brief submissions by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and PIL petitioners including lawyers Prashant Bhushan and M L Sharma. The law officer said he had given a note on the committee’s names and “remit” (scope) in a sealed cover. “‘This has been given with two intentions in mind.
- A holistic view is taken and the truth comes out;
- No unintended message goes out having an impact on the security market, which is an emotion-driven market,” Mehta said.
SEBI for sharholders
The bench referred to the losses suffered by the investors. S G Mehta said he has no issues with regard to any judge supervising the committee. “We would rather not accept the sealed cover suggestions. We want to ensure transparency. In case we take your suggestions from sealed cover, it automatically means the other party won’t know,” said the bench, which also comprised Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala.
“We want full transparency for the protection of investors. We will form a committee. There will be a sense of confidence in the court,” the bench said. “Sitting (SC) judges can hear the matter and they cannot be part of the committee,” the CJI said, adding he has been facing difficulties in setting up benches every day.
On February 10, the top court had said the interest of Indian investors need to be protected against market volatility in the backdrop of the Adani Group stocks rout and asked the Centre to consider setting up a panel of domain experts headed by a former judge to look at strengthening the regulatory mechanism.
The hearing today was crucial
The crucial hearing on the PILs on Friday assumed significance in the wake of the recent developments like the Centre agreeing to the apex court’s proposal to set up a committee, likely to be headed by a former Supreme Court judge, to go into the regulatory regimes.
No sealed cover
The Centre had told the bench that it wanted to provide details such as names and the scope of the panel’s mandate in a “sealed cover”. Stock market regulator SEBI, in its note filed in the top court, had indicated it is not in favour of banning short-selling or sale of borrowed shares and said it is investigating allegations made by a tiny short-seller against the Adani Group as well as its share price movements.
Four PILs thus far
Till now, four PILs have been filed in the top court on the issue by lawyers M L Sharma, Vishal Tiwari, Congress leader Jaya Thakur and Mukesh Kumar, who claims to be a social activist. Tiwari, in his PIL, sought a direction from the Centre to constitute a committee monitored by a retired apex court judge to inquire into the Hindenburg Research report which has made a slew of allegations against the business conglomerate led by industrialist Gautam Adani.
Another PIL filed by advocate M L Sharma sought prosecution of short-seller Nathan Anderson of the US-based Hindenburg Research and his associates in India and the US for allegedly exploiting innocent investors and the “artificial crashing” of the Adani Group’s stock value in the market. Congress leader Thakur, in his plea, has sought an investigation under the supervision of a sitting apex court judge against the Adani Group of companies in light of the allegations.
The fourth PIL represented by noted lawyer Prashant Bhushan seeks a probe by multiple central Government agencies under the supervision of a panel or a former apex court judge against the Adani Group following allegations of fraud and share price manipulation. “Direct appropriate audit (transactional and forensic audits), inquiry and investigation by appropriate agencies such as Serious Frauds Investigation Office (SFIO); Registrar of Companies (RoC); Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI); ED (Directorate of Enforcement) on money-laundering aspect; I-T (Income-Tax Department on aspects of offshore transactions and tax-havens involved and DRI( Department of Revenue Intelligence),” the fourth plea filed by Anamika Jaiswal said.
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- CBI books Rolls Royce of corruption in Hawk 115 Advanced Jet Trainer aircraft deal - May 29, 2023
- Jet Airways: NCLAT allows more time for Jalan Kalrock Consortium to make payments; rejects lenders’ plea for invoking guarantee - May 26, 2023
- NIA urges Delhi High Court, seeks death penalty for Kashmiri terrorist Yasin Malik - May 26, 2023
We now have a new breed called PIL-JVEES. The mutual fund investments are SUBJECT TO MARKET RISKS. Obviously the the investors either take calculated affordable risk or are either greedy gamblers or just stupid. Has Adani saga distorted the entire market? Sensex is a sensitivity Index which often goes down and comes up as well even without involvement of any criminality. Is there a criminality involved? Is it manipulation within the system, which needs to be addressed to avoid deliberately created volatility in the market ? Transparency in the appointments demands when, how, who and why are the appointments are made for all to know and not just the petitioners who claim to be fighting for the interest of investors.
The BJP Government’s days of trying to run the country through sealed envelopes has ended.
There can be no justice when information is hidden.
I hope this Government is finished long before this Government elections are held next year .