Delhi High Court upholds TRAI regulations limiting advertisements on TV to 12 minutes per hour

    Delhi HC has upheld TRAI’s rule restricting television advertisements to 12 minutes per hour, rejecting broadcasters’ claims that the cap violates their constitutional rights

    Delhi HC has upheld TRAI’s rule restricting television advertisements to 12 minutes per hour, rejecting broadcasters’ claims that the cap violates their constitutional rights
    Delhi HC has upheld TRAI’s rule restricting television advertisements to 12 minutes per hour, rejecting broadcasters’ claims that the cap violates their constitutional rights

    No more ad overload: Court upholds TRAI regulations

    The Delhi High Court on Friday upheld the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) rule capping advertisements in television to 12 minutes per hour. A Division Bench of Justices Anil Kshetarpal and Amit Mahajan rejected the petitions filed by broadcasters challenging the time cap on TV ads. The Court said that the TRAI acted within its statutory powers in framing the regulations, which were aimed at protecting viewers from excessive commercial interruptions.

    Several TV channels challenged Rule 7(11) of the Cable Television Network Rules, 1994, and TRAI’s 2012 and 2013 regulations, which imposed a ceiling of 10 minutes of commercial advertisements and 2 minutes of self-promotional content per hour. Broadcasters argued that the per-clock-hour cap violated their rights under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution, contending that advertising revenue was essential for the survival of television channels, especially free-to-air and regional broadcasters.

    News broadcasters claimed the restriction directly affected commercial speech protected under Article 19(1)(a), while regional channels said the cap threatened their financial viability. The High Court rejected these arguments and held that the regulations were aimed at improving the quality of viewing experience for consumers.

    The Bench observed that television viewers could not skip advertisements in real time and that excessive interruptions adversely affected audience interest. It said the 12-minute cap was a “code-based normative standard” intended to balance commercial interests with consumer welfare.

    “Keeping in view the above position of law, as well as the facts and circumstances of the present case, the present Petitions are dismissed. The Regulation 3 of the Regulation of 2012, passed by the TRAI, effectuating Rule 7 (11) of the Rule of 1994, which are under challenge herein, fail to meet the rights envisaged under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution,” said the High Court, ratifying the TRAI Order.

    For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

    We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
    Team PGurus

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    error: Content is protected !!