Extraordinary popular delusions at the Eccles

If we learn from at least our own mistakes, the most sensible way forward would be to bring down the Eccles building and never even contemplate replacing it with another

If we learn from at least our own mistakes, the most sensible way forward would be to bring down the Eccles building and never even contemplate replacing it with another
If we learn from at least our own mistakes, the most sensible way forward would be to bring down the Eccles building and never even contemplate replacing it with another

What emerges from latest FOMC meeting indicates a complete lack of macroeconomic fundamentals

Never in the history of the world has the financial well-being of so many tied to the economic competence of so few. Yet what emerged from the latest FOMC meeting (March 15-16th) indicates a complete lack of the macroeconomic fundamentals that are driving the markets.

Given how wrong the US Fed has been in its forecasts of transitory inflation, one would have hoped that Fed officials would have questioned some of their basic assumptions which had led to such dramatically erroneous conclusions. Yet, they continue down the path of mistaking bubbles for growth, extremely frothy market valuations for solid fundamentals, and the cheery market consensus for stable equilibrium.

Make no mistake – We are in extreme bubble territories for the asset classes of equities, bonds (despite the recent routing, valuations are still very frothy – more on that latter), and real estate. US GDP numbers these days are pretty much largely dependent on the reserve currency status and are just a pin-prick away from a cascading collapse on multiple fronts. What lies in the months and years ahead is sheer mayhem in the equities, bonds, and real estate markets and consequently in the economy and currency markets as well.

A legitimate question at this point would be what has changed in the immediate past to convert what was an inevitable event into an imminent one? Just to point out, the fundamentals of the US economy have been degrading for at least a couple of decades now and it was the apparently low consumer price inflation despite all of the monetary inflation (i.e. expansion of the money supply) that was masking the disease. Economists, investors, and the general public have been mistaking the equity, real estate, and bond bubbles (which are a direct consequence of the monetary inflation) as indicative of a sustainable economy.

The March FOMC meeting

Interested readers can read the complete FOMC minutes from the Federal Reserve website. We will just examine two aspects that are relevant to the current discussion.

Fed Minutes Projected Outcomes Likely Outcomes
Quantitative Tightening 

  • All participants agreed that elevated inflation and tight labour market conditions warranted the commencement of balance sheet runoff from May.  
  • Significant reduction in the balance sheet over the coming years. 
  • Reduction of US Fed holdings of treasuries up to $60B/month and MBS by up to $35B/month. 
The current US Fed Balance sheet size of nearly $9T could be lowered to $8.5T by end of 2022 and $7.5T by end of 2023 The balance sheet reduction may never start or even if does, the process would be reversed very soon due to market declines.

The Fed balance sheet would be well above $10T by the end of 2022 and close to $15T by 2023 

Economic Outlook 

  • With appropriate firming in the stance of monetary policy, participants expected inflation to return to the Committee’s 2% objective over time and the labour market to remain strong 
The unemployment rate at the current 3.8% rate would be maintained around that level.

CPI data for March which came in at 8.5% is expected to moderate over the next few months.

As the recession sets in H2 of CY 2022 due to increased rates, unemployment would be significantly higher than the current 3.8%.  
Inflation which is at 8.5% will be in double digits by 2023. 
Economists would also re-learn the absurdity of the Philips curve for the second time since the 1970s.


Why is quantitative tightening Impossible?

Let me explain. I am not saying that the Fed cannot embark on QT. They can, they have in the past (in 2018 under Yellen and this was prematurely abandoned within a year due to adverse market conditions) and they will probably again do so in May. But they can NEVER take it through to the projected closure. They will have to abandon the attempt midway due to tightening liquidity conditions that would manifest in ways such as the Junk Bonds markets freezing, the Repo crisis, etc. What causes the reversal of the oncoming QT is impossible to speculate, but suffice to say that some weak link in this domino chain will break.

For the same reasons that each QE was bigger than its previous version, each QT would be shorter as compared to the previous attempt. It is also a reasonable supposition at this point that this will be the last (unsuccessful) attempt at QT and all that we will have after 2022 is only QE to infinity. Mises provides the perfect QE/ QT analogy with that of a drug addict on an artificial high – the victim will require increasing doses over time and the withdrawal symptoms from a higher level of dosage would be that much more severe and difficult to endure.

The Justification – QE is just a fancy way of stating inflation or monetization of deficits or buying assets that other investors/ central banks will not buy. At least not at the price it is offered at. The US government has been running gigantic deficits to the tune of a few trillion dollars and the US Fed has been buying up these treasury sales at pretty much “next-to-nothing” yields for the last decade. The pace has intensified over the years as one can observe from the chart below.

Image 1 source: American Action Forum
Image 1 source: American Action Forum

The deficit of the US government for 2022 would be to the tune of $3T. If the US Fed which has been the biggest buyer of treasuries in the last few years now becomes the second biggest seller (after the US Treasury, of course) who is going to be the buyer? Even assuming they can find a buyer, at what price can such transactions be effected? The biggest buyers of these treasuries before the US Fed stepped in were the Central Banks of China, Russia, Saudi Arabis, etc. I presume I don’t have to justify the assumption that these buyers are not going to return to the table for the foreseeable future. Not even the other “friendlier” Central Banks such as Japan or ECB is going to step in as they have their own inflation problems to deal with.

If at all such a sale can be affected, it has to be at yields that are substantially higher. The 10-year treasuries have had a steep rise over the last couple of years – from 0.60% in June 2020 to 2.86% today – and this has been caused just by the talk of raising rates & QT even without a meaningful walk. To the common investor used to the gyrations of cryptos, this may not seem like much, but any Bond investor will tell that this is indeed an unprecedented move. This 10 year could easily move to 5% if the US Fed continues with QT and this would be devasting for the housing and bond markets. I think this current 2.86% over the 10 years is sufficient to break the housing bubble given a reasonable time of 6 to 12 months. If rates continue climbing, then we could well be talking about weeks and the Jeremy Irons “THIS IS IT” moment (from the movie “Margin call”) will be upon us before we know it.

I have assumed a few months of QT in the current cycle, but QT could well easily be dead on arrival. Anybody who says the process of QT would be “like watching paint dry” as then Fed chair Janet Yellen quipped in 2017, either doesn’t understand economics is just plain lying.

The reality of stagflation

The Fed is forecasting stable unemployment and a cooling CPI and they will be wrong on both counts. Both CPI and unemployment, even using the heavily manipulated US Govt data, are likely to be in double-digits over the next few years and if measured accurately, the first digit is unlikely to be “1” on both counts.

The Justification – Given the bubbles the US economy is built upon, the US Fed would have been content to keep rates at zero and persist with QE indefinitely but for the nagging CPI numbers. Of course, for decades, the real CPI has been higher than the reported CPI. They have managed this through hedonics, substitutions, owner’s equivalent rent, and other adjustments that understate the CPI. Even the march reading of 8.5%, a very high number by historical standards, dramatically understates the real inflation within the system. As John Williams of Shadow Statistics points out, if we use the same fixed basket of goods as we did during the 1980s, the CPI today will be higher than 15%.

The scenario with the unemployment numbers is no different. If we use the U6 unemployment statistics (U3 + short-term discouraged and unemployed + forced to work part-time due to lack of full-time employment opportunities) which is the broadest measure of unemployment, the current unemployment number would be almost twice the reported 3.8%. The Shadow Statistics number in the attached picture adds the long-term discouraged workers who have been excluded from the labour force and hence not reflected in U6 as well.

So the real numbers for inflation and unemployment even today are substantially higher than the currently reported government numbers. Nothing surprising about these self-appraisals, especially given that it is controlled by the political class. But the more important point is that we are closer to the trough than the peak in terms of inflation and unemployment numbers in the current malinvestments correction cycle. The massive misallocations of capital due to artificially low-interest rates of the last few decades are in the early stages of being rectified. Such a correction has never happened from a position of extreme vulnerability that the US Economy is in today (i.e. trillion-dollar trade and budget deficits) and as I have written earlier, the End Game is going to be one for the history books.

The end game

The US Fed will probably start the QT(2) process in May which will lead to a near breakdown of the financial system within a few weeks/ months. QT1 in 2018 lasted for nearly a year, but the leverage and the imbalances within the system are far greater today than it was in 2018. QT2 will then be replaced with QE (to infinity) in short-order “to save the economy”. Quite unlike the 2008 to 2018 period during which despite the QE series CPI numbers remained benign, the effect this time around will probably be the opposite – courtesy, Cantillon effects. The to-be-announced QE (the Fed may not call it QE this time around though. The end result however will be a massive expansion in the balance sheet) is going to send even the manipulated CPI numbers well north of 10%.

At which point, whether the US Fed increases the Fed funds rate or otherwise, the 10-year treasury will continue to move northwards with devastating consequences for the housing, bond, and equity markets.

How long will the bear markets continue? My guess is that the Fed will continue to lag behind the inflationary curve for at least the next 2 to 3 years. Over the medium term of the next 3 to 5 years, whether this economic crisis ends in a hyperinflationary depression with the US Dollar losing all of its value or in a deflationary bust where stocks and real estate lose most of their value with the USD retaining a reasonable portion of its value is something that only time will tell. But I would be inclined into speculating that the former is a far more likely outcome, by a wide margin than the latter.

If we learn from at least our own mistakes, the most sensible way forward would be to bring down the Eccles building and never even contemplate replacing it with another.

1. Text in Blue points to additional data on the topic.
2. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.

PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

1. IIIT / IIM and then worked in US and Europe for about 7 years thru Infosys.
2. Returned to India in 2005 and have been an investor ever since
3. Focus on investing in precious metal equities, particularly Gold, Battery Metals and Uranium Juniors.
Latest posts by Shanmuganathan Nagasundaram (see all)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here