Lok Sabha expels Mahua Moitra; TMC leader equates action with ‘hanging by a kangaroo court’

Takeaway from Mahua Moitra’s expulsion - Freedom of Speech has limits and the same goes for the privileges of an MP

Takeaway from Mahua Moitra’s expulsion - Freedom of Speech has limits and the same goes for the privileges of an MP
Takeaway from Mahua Moitra’s expulsion - Freedom of Speech has limits and the same goes for the privileges of an MP

Mahua Moitra expelled from Lok Sabha after Ethics Panel recommendation in cash-for-query row

Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra was expelled on Friday from the Lok Sabha after the House adopted the report of its Ethics Committee that held her guilty of accepting gifts and illegal gratification from a businessman to further his interest. After a heated debate over the panel report during which Moitra was not allowed to speak, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi moved a motion to expel the Trinamool member for “unethical conduct”, which was adopted by a voice vote.

Lok Sabha Speaker OM Birla pointed out that the concerned MP (Mahua Moitra) was not allowed to speak as per the customs of the House and the opportunity was given to her to tell her version before the Ethics Committee. Reacting sharply to her expulsion, Moitra equated the action with hanging by a “kangaroo court” and alleged a parliamentary panel was being weaponized by the government to force the opposition into submission.

She told reporters that she has been found guilty of breaching a code of ethics that does not exist and that there was no evidence of cash or gift given to her. The Ethics Committee report found Moitra guilty of “unethical conduct” and contempt of the House by sharing her Lok Sabha credentials — User ID and Password of Lok Sabha Member’s Portal, with unauthorized persons which had an irrepressible impact on national security.

She was caught for accepting money and gifts from a Dubai settled businessman Darshan Hiranandani for raising questions against industrialist Gautam Adani in Lok Sabha. The investigation found that she shared her User ID of Parliament with Darshan Hiranandani to place questions before Parliament. The businessman later turned as Approver admitting his relations with the lady MP.[1]

The motion moved by Joshi said that Moitra’s “conduct has further been found to be unbecoming as a member of parliament for accepting gifts and illegal gratification from a businessman to further his interest which is a serious misdemeanour and highly deplorable conduct” on her part. Joshi urged the House to accept the recommendation and finding of the committee and “resolve that continuance of Mahua Moitra as member of Lok Sabha is untenable and she may be expelled from the membership of the Lok Sabha”.

Trinamool Congress and other opposition members demanded that Moitra be allowed to put her views in the House, which was turned down by Speaker Om Birla citing past precedence. Birla observed that in 2005, the then Speaker Somnath Chatterjee had in a directive disallowed 10 Lok Sabha members, who were involved in a ‘cash for questions’ scam, to speak in the House.

Joshi said in 2005 the then Leader of the House Pranab Mukherjee had moved a motion to expel 10 members on the same day the report was introduced in the Lok Sabha. Earlier, Ethics Committee Chairman Vinod Kumar Sonkar tabled the first report of the Committee on the complaint filed by BJP member Nishikant Dubey against Moitra.

Reference:

[1] Darshan Hiranandani turns approver. Says have given money and gifts to Mahua. Used her Parliament Email ID to ask questions against AdaniOct 19, 2023, PGurus.com

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
Team PGurus

1 COMMENT

  1. Nobody who has been found guilty has ever praised the court hence KANGAROO COURT comment. Once the MP has accepted that the LS credentials were shared and gifts received, the wrongdoing is established beyond doubt. The issues of what was the quantum of the gifts, what use the shared credentials were put to or whether everyone else acted in the same way are merit no discussion.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here