‘Enthiran’ director S Shankar in legal trouble
Assets worth more than Rs.10 crore of Director Shankar of the 2010 movie ‘Enthiran‘ facing charges of plagiarism and copyright violations have been attached under the anti-money laundering law, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) said on Thursday. This is possibly the first attachment of assets in the country under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), on grounds of plagiarism or copyright violation while making a movie, as per officials.
A provisional order was issued on February 17 under the PMLA attaching three immovable properties of the Director, S Shankar, the ED said in a statement. The total value of these assets is Rs.10.11 crore, it said. The money laundering case stems from a complaint filed by Aarur Tamilnadan, author of a story titled ‘Jiguba‘, against Shankar before a court at Egmore in Chennai on May 19, 2011.
ED, Chennai has provisionally attached 3 immovable properties registered in the name of S. Shankar, with a total value of Rs.10.11 Crore (approx.) on 17/02/2025 under the provisions of PMLA, 2002.
— ED (@dir_ed) February 20, 2025
The complaint alleges that the storyline of the Tamil movie ‘Enthiran’ (Robot), directed by Shankar, was copied from ‘Jiguba’ thereby rendering Shankar liable for violations under the Copyright Act, 1957 and some sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the ED said. ‘Enthiran’ was released in 2010 and featured Rajinikanth and Aishwarya Rai as the main lead. It grossed Rs.290 crore worldwide, making it an all-time blockbuster at the time, the ED said.
The federal probe agency said its investigation found that Shankar received a “substantial” remuneration of Rs.11.5 crore for his “multi-faceted” contributions to ‘Enthiran’, including story development, screenplay, dialogues, and direction. Further, an independent report by the Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) identified “striking” similarities between the story ‘Jiguba’ and the movie ‘Enthiran’. This report, which examined narrative structure, character development, and thematic elements, lends significant support to the plagiarism allegations against Shankar, the agency said.
“Based on the substantial evidence and records in hand, it has been determined that S Shankar has violated Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, a violation now classified as a scheduled offence under the PMLA,” the ED said.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- India holds Pakistan responsible for Pahalgam attack; stops Indus Water talks, shuts Attari Check Post, halts issuing visas to Pakistanis - April 23, 2025
- Harvard sues Trump administration to stop the freeze of more than USD 2 billion in grants - April 22, 2025
- Google settles Android TV case with Competition Commission of India, pays Rs.20.24 crore - April 21, 2025
Rs. 10 crores is paltry for a movie which earned Rs. 290 crores. Direct payout. No point in wasting court or ED’s time.
There was no plagiarism, but a case of cheap imitation cum inspiration.