SC panels suggest amending laws to protect privacy rights, the nation’s cyber security
The Supreme Court on Thursday said the technical panel appointed by it to probe the unauthorized use of Pegasus has found some malware in five mobile phones out of the 29 examined but it could not be concluded that it was due to the Israeli spyware. After perusing the report submitted by former apex court Justice R V Raveendran, Chief Justice N V Ramana also noted that the Central government did not cooperate with the Pegasus probe. The apex court also decided to upload portions of the report on its website.
The three-judge bench said the overseeing panel has submitted a “lengthy” report in three parts. One of the parts suggested amending the law to protect citizens’ right to privacy and ensure the nation’s cyber security. “They (Committees) have observed that the Government of India did not cooperate. Whatever stand you had taken here, you have taken the same stand before the committee also”, the bench, also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, said. The court will now hear the matter after four weeks.
Referring to a report of the technical panel, the bench said it was “little concerned” as it appeared that out of 29 phones, which were submitted to the technical committee for examination, five had some “kind of malware” but it cannot be said that these are due to Pegasus.
“So far as the technical committee report is concerned and it appears that there is a request from the persons, who have given their phones, that the report not be shared…It appears that some 29 phones have been given and in five phones, they found some malware but it does not mean that it is malware from the Pegasus…,” the CJI said.
The bench said the report of Justice Raveendran has suggestions on protecting the citizens’ right to privacy, the future course of action, accountability, amending the law to improve privacy protection, and the grievances redressal mechanism. It said that the report of the overseeing judge suggested some remedial measures and one is that there should be “amendments in the existing laws and the procedures on surveillance and right to privacy.”
“Second is enhancing and improving the cyber security of the nation,” the bench said, adding that the report also suggested the “establishment of a mechanism for citizens to raise grievances of illegal surveillance.” Noting that it was a “huge report”, the bench said it will see what portion can be given and added that there was also a request not to release the report.
“These are technical issues. So far as Justice Raveendran’s report is concerned, we will upload it on the website,” the CJI said. Senior lawyers Kapil Sibal and Rakesh Dwivedi urged the bench to release a “redacted report” to the litigants. When the bench said the Centre did not cooperate, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta responded by saying he was unaware of that.
The technical panel, which included three experts on cyber security, digital forensics, networks, and hardware, was asked to “inquire, investigate and determine” whether Pegasus spyware was used for snooping on citizens and their probe would be monitored by Raveendran. The panel members were Naveen Kumar Chaudhary, Prabaharan P, and Ashwin Anil Gumaste.
Justice Raveendran, who headed the monitoring panel, was assisted by former IPS officer Alok Joshi and cyber security expert Sundeep Oberoi in monitoring the inquiry of the technical panel. The top court last year ordered a probe into the allegations of the use of Israeli spyware by government agencies for targeted surveillance of politicians, journalists, and activists and appointed technical and supervisory committees to look into the Pegasus row.
The apex court, in its order, had said that the probe panel would be empowered to enquire and investigate what steps or actions have been taken by the Centre after reports were published in 2019 about the hacking of WhatsApp accounts of Indian citizens, using the Pegasus suite of spyware. Also whether any Pegasus suite was acquired by the Union of India, any state government, or any central or state agency for use against the citizens of India.
An international media consortium had reported that over 300 verified Indian mobile phone numbers were on the list of potential targets for surveillance using the Pegasus spyware.
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- CBI books Rolls Royce of corruption in Hawk 115 Advanced Jet Trainer aircraft deal - May 29, 2023
- Jet Airways: NCLAT allows more time for Jalan Kalrock Consortium to make payments; rejects lenders’ plea for invoking guarantee - May 26, 2023
- NIA urges Delhi High Court, seeks death penalty for Kashmiri terrorist Yasin Malik - May 26, 2023
It appears that the perpetrators of injustice in the government , judiciary and bureaucracy will answer only to the Gods.
The atmosphere in temples today is the smell of money. For building or running these temples.
Sharing loot with God and trying to make God an accessory to their crimes. And in God’s name.
They will report to Satan on their demise.
For a good job done on his behalf.
Of the 300 phones only 29 were given for screening the others wanted the expert committee to declared their phones infected without looking into their instruments possibly for fear of getting caught with porn or other objectionable material. These are the same people who wanted the Rafael weaponry laid out in public and confirmation from government that we have the Pegasus. The government should not and will not either accept or deny any thing which will be detrimental to the security of the country and these clown are seeking just that for their political ends. The courts would have been right in seeing this through and thrown such petitions without hearing.
Sick cases, filed for time pass. Not worth the effect. Moreover for a country like India where internal enemies & Traitors are too many & everyone should be spied for next 2 decades, till this traitors are eliminated.