Centre tells SC that data on violence against Christians has been exaggerated
The Government of India on Thursday disputed in the Supreme Court the figure pertaining to alleged attacks on Christian institutions and priests, terming the data “wrong” and claiming the petitioners wanted to keep “the pot boiling” to sully the image of the country abroad. The apex court was hearing a PIL filed by Rev. Peter Machado of the National Solidarity Forum, Rev. Vijayesh Lal of Evangelical Fellowship of India, and others claiming violence against members of the Christian community.
A bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud was earlier told by the PIL petitioners that from 2021 to May 2022, 700 cases of violence against members of the Christian community were reported and a majority of those arrested were followers of the faith. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referred to a report containing the case data received from states like Bihar and Chhattisgarh and said most of them related to disputes involving neighbours and, coincidentally, one of the parties happened to be a Christian.
The Solicitor General, the top law officer of the government told the bench, also including Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala, to take note of the matter based on the figures provided by the PIL petitioners which were wrong. SG Tushar Mehta cited the Union Home Ministry’s data collected from all state governments on the cases of violence against the Christian community and said that the petitioners hyped the figures to malign India abroad.
“The petitioner claimed that there are some 500 incidents where Christians were attacked. We sent everything to the state governments. We collated all the information we got. First, let us see Bihar. The total number of cases, which petitioners gave, is related to internal fights between neighbours where one of the parties happens to be a Christian.
“The figure given by them, which obviously persuaded your lordships, was not correct,” said the Solicitor General, adding that Union Home Ministry has collated the responses from all the states. Altogether 38 such incidents were reported from Bihar, and as per the report, they pertained to fights between two neighbours one of whom happened to be a Christian.
Claiming that the petitioners (many belong to Christian Missionaries) wanted to keep the “pot boiling”, Mehta said such judicial proceedings being pursued by them will send out a wrong message to the public at large. “This is how it is being displayed outside the country. This is the message that goes out to the public that Christians are in danger and are being attacked. This is wrong,” the top law officer said.
“Wherever there is a grave offence and arrests had to be made… Arrests have been made,” he said, asserting the numbers submitted by the petitioners were incorrect.
He said 64 arrests were made in Chhattisgarh alone where the state has created a helpline for reporting such incidents. The petition said 495 attacks took place on Christians and their institutions in Chhattisgarh, but the report says they never happened, the law officer asserted.
The apex court took note of the report filed by the Government of India and granted three weeks to the petitioners to respond to it after senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, appearing for them, said he received the government’s affidavit late last night. Earlier, the bench had directed the Centre to file a report on alleged attacks on Christian institutions and priests across the country as well as on the implementation of its earlier guidelines to curb hate crimes.
Prior to this, the apex court had said there was a need to separate the “grain from the chaff” and asked the MHA to seek reports from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Bihar, and Jharkhand on alleged attacks on members of the Christian community. The top court had said though it believes crime against an individual does not necessarily mean crime against society, even if 10 percent of the cases alleged in the PIL is true it needs to go to the bottom of the issue.
The government told the court it should not entertain the PIL based on “self-serving reports” as it could have wider ramifications. The Central government had contended 162 of the cases mentioned in the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) had been found to be fake on verification at the ground level.
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- Canadian parliamentary committee urges border agency to stop deporting Indian students caught in fake admission letter scandal - June 8, 2023
- India successfully test fires Agni Prime Missile - June 8, 2023
- CBI chargesheets lobbyist Deepak Talwar for floating NGO and routing money from defence, civil aviation companies - June 8, 2023
Waste of time to consider these petitions & to be rejected outright for their deeds are unworthy