High Courts directed to speed up the disposal of criminal cases against MPs, MLAs
In a bid to speed up criminal cases against MPs and MLAs, the Supreme Court on Thursday directed High Courts to set up a special bench to monitor cases for their speedy disposal. It also asked special courts not to adjourn proceedings in such matters except “for rare and compelling reasons”. Issuing a slew of directions to high courts, district judges, and special courts designated to hear matters related to lawmakers, the top court directed that criminal cases against members of Parliament, legislative assemblies, and legislative councils be given priority.
“The learned Chief Justice of the High Court shall register a suo motu case titled ‘In Re Designated Courts for MPs/ MLAs‘ to monitor early disposal of criminal cases pending against the members of parliament and the legislative assemblies,” ordered by the bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra with a slew of directions to fast track the trial cases against lawmakers.
The bench said that multiple local factors made it difficult for the top court to “frame uniform or standard guideline for trial courts across the length and breadth of this country” and it left the issue of ensuring speedy trial to the high courts as they have the power of superintendence over the trial courts.
“Under Article 227 of the Constitution, the high courts are entrusted with the power of superintendence over the subordinate judiciary. We deem it appropriate to leave it to the high courts to evolve such a method or apply such measures that they deem expedient for effective monitoring of the subject cases,” the bench said.
The suo motu case may be heard by a special bench presided by the chief justice (of the high court) or judges assigned by him to the special bench that may list matters at regular intervals as felt necessary, it said. “The high court may issue such orders in all directions as unnecessary for expeditious and effective disposal. The special bench may consider calling upon the advocate general or the public prosecutor to assist the court,” directed the bench.
The top court said that a High Court may ask the principal district and sessions judge to bear the responsibility of allocating the subject cases to such court or courts, as is considered appropriate and effective. “The High Court may call upon the principal district and sessions judge to send reports at such intervals as it is considered expedient. The designated court shall give priority, one: to criminal cases against MPs and MLAs punishable with death or life imprisonment, then to the cases punishable with imprisonment for five years or more,” it said, adding that the special courts shall not adjourn the cases except “for rare and compelling reasons“.
The Chief Justice of a High Court may list cases, in which orders of stay of trial have been passed, before the special bench to ensure that appropriate orders, including vacation of the stay orders, are passed to ensure commencement and conclusion of trial, the judgment said.
“The principal district and sessions judge shall ensure sufficient infrastructure facility for the designated courts and also enable it to adopt such technology as is expedient for effective and efficient functioning,” the top court said. “The high court shall create an independent tab on the website providing district-wise information about the details of the year of the filing, the number of subject cases pending, and the stage of proceedings. While monitoring the subject cases, the special bench may pass such orders or directions as are necessary for expeditious disposal, clarified the court,” the bench said.
Disposing of one of the aspects of the PIL relating to ensuring speedy trial of criminal cases against politicians, the bench kept the plea, filed by Ashwini Upadhyay through lawyer Ashwani Dubey, pending to deal with other aspects related to decriminalization of polity in the country.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- Supreme Court rejects plea to tally all VVPAT slips with EVM votes; says ‘no going back to paper ballot’ - April 26, 2024
- US report citing human rights violations is deeply biased: India - April 25, 2024
- Kotak Mahindra Bank shares tank 13%. Market Cap erodes by Rs.37,721 cr post-RBI action - April 25, 2024
Will that mean – National Herald case will be speed up or end up in grave ?
It will be a great leap forward if this approach is take to its logical end. (1) Try the MP’s and MLA’s within one year in the lower courts in six months in HC and within 3 months in SC. to ensure that final out come is out within 21 months. (2) During this period the accused should not be allowed to contest any elections. (3) There should be no intervention of courts during investigation. It will mean a loss of revenue for the hotshot bail experts practicing in the SC