Vyapam Scam: Untangling the web of truth so far

Vyapam - Untangling the Web
Vyapam - Untangling the Web

Nupur Sharma

The Vyapam Scam is one of the biggest scams plaguing Madhya Pradesh for decades. It involved a major racket whereby seats in colleges were sold for cash and several exams were rigged by means of payment, impersonation, the bogie system and tampering with OMR sheets of examinations.

Recently, we started hearing a lot about the Vyapam Scam in the media owing to two deaths in the past few days. One Sub Inspector Anamika Kushwaha who was recruited through Vyapam (Later found that her suicide was related to dowry harassment) and Journalist Akshay Singh who was in MP to cover the Vyapam Scam (Post Mortem report Prima Facie says he died due to an enlarged heart. No foul play. No external or internal injuries).

The Vyapam Scam isn’t really a scam that has only recently come to light. Related cases were reported in the 1990s and the first FIR was lodged in the year 2000 (Chhatarpur District) and then several cases in the year 2004 (Khandwa District). Till the year 2009, it was believed that they’re all unrelated cases and not a part of a larger racket. However, in the year 2009 a Special Task Force (STF) was formed by the Chief Minister (CM) Shivraj Singh Chouhan to investigate the matter.

In 2009, when the severity of the entire Vyapam Scam was realised, a committee was thus formed by CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan that investigated the matter and submitted its report in 2011. In that year itself, over a 100 people were arrested and several students admissions stood cancelled.

By 2013, the investigation was being headed by a court appointed STF The Madhya Pradesh (MP) Government had no role to play in the investigation thereafter.

In July 2013, 20 people were arrested and it was found that the racket was run by Jagdish Sagar since the 1990s. He was arrested in the same month and a list of 317 students was confiscated from him. After intensive interrogation it was found that Pankaj Trivedi was also involved and was trying to protect the students by appealing that their admissions not be cancelled. In September 2013, Mr. Tridevi was also arrested by the police.

In November 2013, the committee found that 5 other recruitment exams had also been rigged and it filed a 23000 page supplementary charge sheet to include 34 accused and filed First Information Reports (FIR) against 153 people which also led to the arrest of about 127 people in the month of March.

In April 2014, there was a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court demanding a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) enquiry in the Vyapam Scam. The HC has struck down that request calling it “Devoid of merit”.

On June 2014, the honorable High Court (HC) of Madhya Pradesh inquired why several accused were not arrested. This is when former technical education minister Mr. Laxmikant Sharma was arrested.

While the investigation was going smoothly, and the noose was certainly tightening around the culprits of this massive Vyapam Scam, One Mr. Prashant Pandey (called Mr. X), an IT consultant hired by the STF was arrested for trying to blackmail the Vyapam Scam accused. He promptly approached Mr. Digvijay Singh of the Congress Party and said he had evidence against CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan and alleged that STF had tampered with the contents of the Excel Sheet that could implicate him.

Mr. Digvijay Singh then proceeded to submitting a 15 page affidavit before the courts accusing the investigators of shielding Mr. Chouhan. Both the excel sheets (one produced by Mr. Digvijay and the other by the investigators) were sent for forensic analysis and was ruled that the one produced by Mr. Digvijay was forged. Mr. Digvijay had also petitioned the court to transfer the Madhya Pradesh Professional Examination Board (MPPEB) investigation from STF to CBI. Instead the High Court set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) on November 7th to monitor the investigations held by the STF.

The court gave ample power to the SIT. It included informing the HC of wrongdoings, if any, of the STF. The SIT was to protect the STF of any undue political influence and no official could be transferred by the MP Government. In totality, the STF monitored by SIT was answerable only the HC and no other body. They were also required to include all details in their charge sheet whether relevant to prosecution or not.

This judgement of the High Court denying the investigation be transferred to CBI was challenged by Mr. Digvijay Singh in the Supreme Court (SC). Unfortunately for Mr. Singh, the SC shot down his plea as well. While doing so, the SC lauded the investigation process of the STF and the Madhya Pradesh Government for cooperating completely with the investigation. The Supreme Court observed that STF was functioning professionally and the MP Govt was taking steps to strengthen the investigation. SC commended the STF for registering cases against politicians and high ranking officials and appreciated its work towards unravelling more cases related to the Vyapam Scam.

By February 2015 STF found evidence against Governor Ram Naresh Yadav (In 2004 general elections, he contested from Azamgarh constituency on Indian National Congress ticket and lost. His appointment as the Governor was made by the Congress Party). He was charged with Criminal Conspiracy and rigging MPPEB Forest Gaurd Recruitment Exams. He had then petitioned a stay on his arrest citing constitutional immunity as he was the governor. The Court had to stay his arrest. It was his son who was found dead in March 2015 under mysterious circumstances.

By June 2015, more than 2000 people have been arrested in connection with the Vyapam Scam. This includes bigwigs from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) like the Ex Technical Education Minister and the Governor from Congress party that has got a stay on his arrest due to constitutional immunity.

Not only does the Vyapam Scam cross party lines, but what makes it murkier is the fact that many people related to the case have been found dead under mysterious circumstances. Though the media is hell bent on relating any and every death to Vyapam Scam (Since fear mongering is always good business), whistle-blower Anand Rai himself says that only about 10 deaths were under mysterious circumstances and may be related to the Vyapam Scam itself, though he also stated that all deaths need to be investigated (The court has itself asked for a list of people related to Vyapam Scam who died so the link, if any, can be established).

After an extremely long chronology of events in this complex Vyapam Scam, certain questions arise.

  1. The first case related to the Vyapam Scam surfaced in the year 1995. The Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh from 7th December 1993 to 8th December 2003 was Mr. Digvijay Singh from the Indian National Congress. How then, can the onus of the Scam be shifted to the Bharatiya Janata Party and how then, can the Congress Party shrug off the responsibility of the scam?
  2. Shivraj Singh Chouhan was lauded by the Supreme Court of India for his cooperation with entire STF led investigation. What is the basis of alleging foul play except mere lip service?
  3. The entire investigation was initiated by Mr. Chouhan in 2009. Why didn’t Mr. Digvijay Singh take action since the scam surfaced in his tenure?
  4. If Congress is convinced of Mr. Chouhans role, why did Mr. Singh feel the need to submit forged documents as evidence without verification?
  5. STF monitored by SIT under supervision of the HC is set to submit its final report about the Vyapam Scam on 15th July 2015. After the entire investigation, deemed fair by the SC and HC, why is Congress insisting on a CBI enquiry which was shot down 3 times? If, as Congress alleges, Mr. Chouhan is guilty, the final report will reflect that. Is the demand for CBI enquiry a diversionary tactic? Does the Congress suspect that the results in the report can make them very uncomfortable?
  6. In the entire investigation, several people belonging to both parties, Congress and BJP have been arrested. That in itself shows the fairness of the Investigation (As observed by the SC as well).
  7. Since the culprits belong from both parties, in a scam spreading over more than 2 decades, isn’t the demand for Mr. Chouhans resignation unfair?
  8. The repeated allegation that Mr. Chouhan has refused a CBI enquiry has also been proved baseless, since the Court itself shot down the petition 3 times. Was all of that mere propaganda by the Media? Or selective reportage?
  9. In a scam that encompasses both major political parties of the country, neither party has the moral authority to shrug off responsibility. Why then hurriedly exonerate one and implicate the other specially when the final report is only a few days away?
  10. Now that Mr. Chouhan has agreed for a CBI enquiry, the focus has shifted from “Why no CBI enquiry” to “He must resign, CBI enquiry not sufficient”. People are dying because of a scam that across party lines spans over 2 decades. Playing petty politics while the final report is due, and the Court has agreed to hear plea of shifting investigation to CBI, works well for whom? Certainly not the ones waiting for justice.
  11. CM Shivraj Singh Chouhan certainly can’t entirely be unquestionable since there are mysterious deaths relating to the Vyapam Scam that has happened on his watch. Whether he is directly involved in the Scam itself is a matter for the courts to decide.

In summary:

The point of this entire article is certainly not to implicate the Congress or exonerate the BJP. As I have mentioned repeatedly, there are people involved from both parties. The point is to untangle a web of misinformation that has now become synonymous with the Vyapam Scam. All the evidence available online, the statements of the honourable HC and of the SC point towards an investigation that has led to the arrest of thousands including big politicians. In my personal opinion, a demand for a CBI enquiry can perhaps be aimed towards derailing an investigation that is set to come to a gruelling end on 15thJuly 2015 with the final report submitted by STF. With fresh petitions for CBI enquiry, we can only hope that the truth is not delayed and justice is not denied. We can only hope.

This article is reproduced with slight edits, from The Frustrated Indian.

Source: The information provided in this article has been sourced from various online blogs, News sites and court documentations. The chief amongst them are:






We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.
Team PGurus



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here