SC questions Centre on delay in decision over Ram Setu monument status
The Supreme Court on Friday sought a response from the Centre on a plea by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy seeking a direction to the government to “expeditiously” decide his representation to declare ‘Ram Setu‘ as a national monument. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta agreed to hear Swamy’s plea and issued notice to the Centre. The Bench posted the matter for hearing after four weeks.
In his plea, Swamy has referred to the January 19, 2023, order passed by the apex court in the matter. On January 19, 2023, the Centre had told the top court that it was looking into the issue pertaining to declaring ‘Ram Setu’ as a national heritage monument. The top court was then hearing Swamy’s plea on the issue.
“The Solicitor General states that the process is currently underway in the Ministry of Culture, but if the petitioner would so desire, he may also submit any additional material or communication as he may wish within a period of two weeks,” the apex court had noted in its January 2023 order. The court had asked the Centre to take a decision on the issue and granted Swamy the liberty to move before it again if he was dissatisfied and disposed of his interim application on the issue.
The fresh plea filed by Swamy said no response or decision taken was conveyed either to him or to the apex court to date. It said the Centre is duty-bound to protect ‘Ram Setu’ from any form of misuse, pollution, or desecration. Advocates Vibha Makhija and Satya Sabhawal represented Subramanian Swamy.
“It is also important to note that this archeological site is a matter of faith and ‘shradha’ of people treating Ram Setu as a pilgrimage and all these archaeological studies and scientific findings are foundational evidence supplementing the existence of the man-made monument as a pilgrimage for worshippers,” the plea said. It said that after the January 19, 2023, order, Swamy had made a representation to the government on January 27, 2023, with all the accompanying documents.
The plea said the petitioner had again written a fresh representation to the government on May 13, 2025. It has sought a direction to the Ministry of Culture “to decide the representation of the petitioner in an expeditious manner/ time-bound manner in compliance with the order of this court dated January 19, 2023”.
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- CBI chargesheets Anil Ambani, Rana Kapoor in Rs.2,796-crore Yes Bank fraud case - September 18, 2025
- HP Consumer Commission orders Air India to pay Rs.52,500 over Subramanian Swamy’s missed flight - September 18, 2025
- Will study implications, take steps to protect national interests: India on Pak-Saudi defence deal - September 18, 2025
