Opposition criticizes Rijiju’s suggestion to include government nominee in the process of deciding judges
With Opposition parties condemning on “Modi government’s attempt to intimidate” judiciary, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday claimed that his letter to Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud seeking government representation in collegium was a “precise follow-up action” suggested by the apex court while striking down the NJAC Act.
Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh accused Rijiju’s letter to CJI was an attempt to intimidate and capture the judiciary. “The VP’s assaults. The Law Minister’s attacks. All this is orchestrated confrontation with the judiciary to intimidate and thereafter capture it totally. The Collegium needs reform. But what this government wants is complete subservience – Its remedy is a poison pill for the judiciary,” said Ramesh in a series of Tweets.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal dubbed the government’s move as “extremely dangerous“. “There should be absolutely no government interference in judicial appointments,” Kejriwal said on Twitter.
Reacting to Kejriwal, the Law Minister said the move is in line with the direction of the Constitution Bench to restructure the MoP (Memorandum of Procedure) of the collegium system. “I hope you honour Court’s direction! This is precise follow-up action of the direction of the Supreme Court Constitution Bench while striking down the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act. The SC Constitution Bench had directed to restructure the MoP (Memorandum of Procedure) of the collegium system,” the minister said on Twitter.
“The contents in the letter to hon’ble CJI are exactly in conformity with the observations and directions of the Supreme Court Constitution Bench. Convenient politics is not advisable, especially in the name of the Judiciary. The Constitution of India is supreme and nobody is above it,” Rijiju said.
He said the government’s demand for the inclusion of its representatives and that of states in collegiums of the Supreme Court and high courts was the “precise follow-up action” suggested by the apex court while striking down the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act.
Former Law Minister and noted lawyer Kapil Sibal blamed the government for attempting to “capture” the judiciary and said it was trying its best to create a situation in which the NJAC in “another avatar” may be tested in the Supreme Court once again. He said that the Government has not adjusted to the fact that it does not have the final word on appointments in higher judiciary and resents it. “They are trying their best to create a situation in which the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) in yet another avatar may be tested in the Supreme Court once again,” said Sibal.
Congress MP and lawyer Vivek Tankha said, “how is it possible Kiren Rijiju in the teeth of NJAC judgment of SC !! Though there are inherent issues in the collegium system, the reigning sentiment in the country is to protect the independence of the judiciary. We request a rethink!!”
“This is absolutely shocking. This is going to grossly undermine the very idea of independence of the judiciary and shall unsettle the fine balance as envisaged through the constitution. Is the government unable to resist the temptation of having a ‘committed Judiciary’,” said RJD leader and Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Kumar Jha.
“The collegium system came into existence as a consequence of the Second and Third Judges case in 1993 & 1998 respectively. The government tried to nullify it by bringing the NJAC paradigm which was struck down by the Supreme Court. Even if the Supreme Court would want to accommodate the Central government’s desire how would they do so the Memorandum of Procedure does not have space for such accommodation. Then the moot question is why only a representative of the government alone?” said Congress MP Manish Tewari.
PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views
For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.
- Supreme Court rejects plea to tally all VVPAT slips with EVM votes; says ‘no going back to paper ballot’ - April 26, 2024
- US report citing human rights violations is deeply biased: India - April 25, 2024
- Kotak Mahindra Bank shares tank 13%. Market Cap erodes by Rs.37,721 cr post-RBI action - April 25, 2024
Chants of Death to democracy, Anti-Poor, Anti-Tribal, Anti-BCs…etc, chants will grow till elections are completed. Pappu is the only messiah, Behenji is the only hope, Didi is the only leader (shudder to think & remember what will happen if this mad lady becomes PM – Sangrur episodes everywhere & every place), D(doubting/dubbing)MK party – Visionary of Century (Courtesy Raghuram), KCR/KTR (Truly matured wines of India), ….etc..
Will see the sunset of Nitish Kumar for sure & slowly disappear into darkness of night of New Moon night (Amavasya), Behenji slip into irrelevance, Didi (mad Lady& loud mouth) steers towards retirement.
Time to close ears !!
Switch off TVs
Watch PGurus on YouTube !!