Reservation and Unemployment have been two of the most vexing issues we’ve been facing since Independence.
If Patidars demand reservation in Gujarat, Gujjars demand it in Rajasthan, and many states like Telengana want to give reservation for Muslims, even as Tamil Nadu has managed to give 69% reservation against 50% in the rest of India.
SC-STs who have historically been denied access to formal education were always assigned the lowest level (often menial) jobs and were never part of the social, political and economic power structure. Since oppression, inequality and discrimination existed almost all through known history, they surely require some out-of-turn access to education, jobs, political power etc, which the nation gave them constitutionally in the form of Reservation (15% for SCs and 7.5% for STs) for a limited period.
Though private educational institutions were required to conform to Reservation Policy, private companies are not bound by the reservation policy.
It has since been extended indefinitely because, despite the reservation, their representation in education and Government jobs hasn’t matched their % of Indian population. Though even private educational institutions were required to conform to Reservation Policy, private companies are not bound by the reservation policy.
Subsequently, some other sections of the society who were not as disadvantaged as the SC-STs but were considered disadvantaged in some ways, fought for and secured reservation under a new OBC (Other Backward Classes) category. Many of them have benefitted much more than SC-STs and their share in education, jobs etc reveals this.
However, it’s also a fact that some sections among OBCs have benefitted a lot less than the others. It is in this context that creamy layers (children of those who earn₹ 8 lakh a year or more for 3 consecutive years) are excluded from reservation.
Most of the demands for additions to OBCs is vote-bank politics, though there may be justification in some cases. It is extremely difficult for anyone to objectively justify who should get reservation and who should not. So, it has become a matter of political string-pulling. Mighty ones getting reservation will make bad policy.
If seven decades of reservation has not been enough to ensure that SC-STs are able to compete on equal footing with the rest of the society, it clearly reflects on the extent of damage their historical subjugation has done to them. So, continuing reservation for SC-STs is clearly justified.
It is the policy of continuing reservation for OBCs (and extending it to economically weaker among Forward Castes, Religious Minorities, etc) which is debatable and much debated.
Dr. Edward de Bono, in his ‘Textbook of Wisdom’, says, “When a heads-on approach does not work, you have to explore new approaches’. He also says, when 2 people fight for a cake, instead of focusing on who to give it to (which will displease one of them), a creative solution is to make the cake bigger so that both can share it.
But for the proliferation of self financing Engineering Colleges, India would have missed the IT revolution, and our economy may not have been as good as it is today.
Opening up of engineering education to private sector led to mushrooming of Engineering Colleges. But it also helped avert nationwide unrest among youth on reservation issue, since almost everyone who wanted to study Engineering could get a seat in some Engineering College at reasonable fees.
Lakhs of our Engineering graduates who studied in the self-financing Engineering Colleges (including a few from SC-STs, and many from poor/ OBC/ disadvantaged backgrounds) got jobs abroad or in India, and some became entrepreneurs, even if lakhs of others became unemployed or grossly underemployed.
But for the proliferation of self-financing Engineering Colleges, India would have missed the IT revolution, and our economy may not have been as good as it is today.
Though there was deterioration in the quality of Engineering education, on the one hand, there was also a certain level of demographic dividend that was reaped, on the other. Like stock markets make their own corrections, the poorly performing Engineering colleges are now being closed down, not because the Government clamped down on them, but because the market forces have rendered them surplus. Which I think is good, as the market is the best regulator.
Though not by design, we thus solved reservation problem partly by opening many self-financing Engineering Colleges.
Similarly, though the number of CAs who graduate every year is very small, there is less of entry barrier; the barrier is more at the exit (i.e., passing out stage). Here again, reservation is no issue because we give opportunities to most aspiring students who want to do Chartered Accountancy.
Arts, Science and Commerce Education have long been open, and so reservation has been less of an issue.
We need to replicate these experiences in all realms, e.g., medical education, para-medical education, teacher education, agricultural education, entrepreneurial education, higher education, etc. We should open up educational opportunities, removing entry barriers, and even giving some freedom for innovation by colleges. A lot more of our youth will then become doctors, nurses, paramedics, teachers, etc in villages and small towns, many will get jobs abroad, not only in developed countries but also developing places like Africa. And our shortages in all these realms will be addressed.
This is like the opening up of the economy in 1991, but on a smaller scale, in the realms of Education & Training and Employment.
Opening up of such educational opportunities won’t, by itself, create jobs, though many more will get employed than at present like it happened during the IT boom. This will at least address the supply side problems; we need to address the demand side issues as well, which we need to do anyway.
I had written another article titled, “Creating Jobs In Jobless GDP Growth Scenario” , wherein I had outlined a proven model of training which can make our graduates of all streams far more generically employable than at present, which will help fill many job openings where employers are unable to get employable people now. The Government has set apart huge funds for such training, part of which is going unutilised, and part of it is squandered away wastefully.
When we combine opening up of the education sector (for self-financed Colleges in just about every stream), with an offering of generic training for all students, we’re likely to solve the twin problems of Reservation and Employment to a significant extent. This is like the opening up of the economy in 1991, but on a smaller scale, in the realms of Education & Training and Employment.
1. Text in Blue points to additional data on the topic.
2. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.
Latest posts by Ganesan Subramanian (see all)
- Can Modi Improve Performance & Sweep 2019 Elections? - December 11, 2017
- Reservation & Unemployment Problems: An Approach Paper - December 4, 2017
- How To Improve The Quality And Speed Of Justice Delivery System? A Retired Judge Provides Solution - November 13, 2017