Aurangzeb, as he really was!

The author has done a remarkable job of refuting this falsified history with the help of factual data enlisted from various contemporaneous sources. Let us have a look

The author has done a remarkable job of refuting this falsified history with the help of factual data enlisted from various contemporaneous sources. Let us have a look
The author has done a remarkable job of refuting this falsified history with the help of factual data enlisted from various contemporaneous sources. Let us have a look

Aurangzeb – Whitewashing Tyrant, Distorting Narrative’: A book that decodes distortions around the Mughal tyrant Aurangzeb

History is the study of past events. And this study should be based on contemporaneous sources. But unfortunately, India’s past has never been presented along with facts. Distortion of India’s past has been a favourite pastime of Marxist historians.

In the recent past, several attempts to secularise the Mughals have taken place with Emperor Aurangzeb at the centre point of this drama. Aurangzeb has been portrayed as a secular ruler who was just with all his subjects. But this portrayal is far away from reality. Aurangzeb was the most vicious Mughal Emperor.

Muhi al-Din Muhammad, commonly known as Aurangzeb and by his regnal title Alamgir, was neither the eldest son of Emperor Shah Jahan nor the heir-apparent. Yet, he managed to succeed his father. But was this succession easy? Definitely not. The events that took place before and after Aurangzeb’s ascension to the Mughal throne are enough to prove his cruelty. Kavi Bhushan, a contemporary poet, has summarised these events in the following verse of his work Shiva Bavani.

किबले की ठोर बाप बादशाह सांहजहा, ताको कैद कियो मानो मक्के आग लायी हे|
बडो भाई दारा को पकरीके मारी दारियो, मेह रहू नाही माको बडो सगा भाई हे||
बंधू तो मुरादबक्ष बादी चुक करिबे को, बिच ले कुरान खुदा की कसम खाई हे|
भूषण सुकवी कहे सुनो नवरंग जेब, ये तो काम किन्ने तेयु पादशाही पाई हे ||

Meaning: Aurangzeb, you imprisoned your father, Emperor Shah Jahan. You forgot that one’s father is as great as the Holy Kaaba. This act of yours is like setting Mecca on fire. You killed your brother Dara (Shikoh), who was born of your own mother. There was no pity for him in your heart. You swore on the holy Quran that you would not betray your brother Murad (Baksh). Yet, you tricked and imprisoned him. This is how you have landed yourself on the Throne.

Figure 1. Dara Shikoh's head being presented to Aurangzeb (Source: Storia do Mogor, Niccolao Manucci)
Figure 1. Dara Shikoh’s head being presented to Aurangzeb (Source: Storia do Mogor, Niccolao Manucci)

Saurabh D Lohogaonkar, the author, in his debut attempt, ‘Aurangzeb Whitewashing Tyrant, Distorting Narrative’ has made an exemplary effort in deconstructing the false narrative that was being built around the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. In doing so, the author has placed in front of his readers, almost all contemporaneous sources available at his disposal.

The author also sheds light on the resistance offered by the Marathas, especially by Chhatrapati Shivaji and Chhatrapati Sambhaji against the tyrannical rule of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb. The Maasir-i-Alamgiri, originally written in Persian by Saqi Must’ad Khan and translated into English by Sir Jadunath Sarkar, clearly mentions that Chhatrapati Sambhaji was brutally murdered because his resistance against the Mughal Empire was seen as a war against Islam itself. Hence, the Masters of the Holy Law (Islam) and Faith (Ulamas) counselled the Emperor to pass the death sentence. This instance alone is adequate to prove that Aurangzeb was a religious fanatic. And this fanaticism cannot be whitewashed.

Mr. Lohogaonkar, in his attempt to deconstruct the narrative set by these modern revisionists, has provided the readers with 8 appendices which, according to me, are the essence of this academic work. These appendices alone are sufficient to bust the lies spread by certain historians, who, in their journey to portray Aurangzeb as a secular ruler, have distorted several recorded facts. The author has done a remarkable job of refuting this falsified history with the help of factual data enlisted from various contemporaneous sources. Let us have a look at one example.

Myth: Aurangzeb was a secular ruler and never destroyed a temple.

Busting the Myth: The author has provided a list of 197 instances of coerced religious conversions where hundreds of Hindus were converted. Along with this, the author has also provided the readers with a list of temples that were destructed during Aurangzeb’s reign. And all the above-mentioned instances of both, forceful conversions and the destruction of temples, are backed by several contemporaneous sources.

Note: The lists are indicative and based on recorded instances. Unrecorded instances cannot even be anticipated.

Figure 2. The Keshava Rai temple at Mathura being demolished on the orders of Aurangzeb
Figure 2. The Keshava Rai temple at Mathura being demolished on the orders of Aurangzeb

The author has extensively quoted from Mughal Akhbars, Imperial Farmaans, and chronicles, especially, the works of Khafi Khan (Muntakhab-al Lubab), Saqi Mustaid Khan (Maasir-i-Alamgiri), Ishwardas Nagar (Futuhat-i-Alamgiri), Bhimsen Saxena (Tarikh-i-Dilkusha), all of whom, who was at some point, employed under the Mughal administration. All the above-mentioned contemporary texts, related directly to the Mughal court can hardly be discarded. For instance, Maasir-i-Alamgiri was composed within years of Aurangzeb’s death in 1707, on the orders of Inayethullah Khan Kashmiri, Aurangzeb’s last secretary, and favourite disciple.

Towards the end of this academic work, the author briefly penned the aftermath of the Mughal Empire post-Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb’s long war in the Deccan, against the Marathas, weakened his Empire. The Empire was at its zenith and literally collapsed within 50 years of Aurangzeb’s death. The Marathas on the other hand rose to become a formidable force and dominated the politics of 18th-century India.

I would like to congratulate the author, Mr. Saurabh D Lohogaonkar, on this extensively researched academic work.

It is an axiom of historical investigation that no authority, however great, is more reliable than his sources”.
Surendra Nath Sen (From the foreword of Foreign Biographies of Shivaji)

After a thorough reading of this book, I can assure all the readers that the author, Mr. Saurabh D Lohogaonkar has lived by these words. History must be presented factually as the events in the past cannot be changed in the present. I am sure the readers will benefit from this work.

You can order the book from Amazon.[1]

Note:
1. Text in Blue points to additional data on the topic.
2. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.

Reference:

[1] Aurangzeb – Whitewashing Tyrant, Distorting Narrative – May 16, 2022, Amazon.in

PGurus is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with all the latest news and views

For all the latest updates, download PGurus App.

Rashmin Kulkarni is a Civil Engineer based in Pune. His passion for history led him to become a Life Member of the prestigious Bharat Itihas Sanshodhak Mandal. Along with this, he is the General Secretary of Jhunj Pratishthan, an organisation working in the field of conservation of heritage structures in and around Pune.
Rashmin Kulkarni
Latest posts by Rashmin Kulkarni (see all)

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here