Did Sibal and coterie try to bully the Supreme Court to derail the Ayodhya case?

Is Sibal risking his and his party's future?

Is Sibal risking his and his party's future by pleading for Sunni Wakf Board?
Is Sibal risking his and his party's future?

It was literally chaotic. During the beginning of arguments in the Ayodhya case, a battery of lawyers, led by Congress leader Kapil Sibal in the Supreme Court, tried to bully the apex court. This exposes the fact that the Congress leadership, Sunni Muslim, Left – Liberal and the so-called secular leaders are delaying a permanent settlement to the Centuries-long dispute.

At last Sibal tried to provoke BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, the intervenor in the case by alleging that Swamy is behind the speedy listing of the case. Sibal produced Swamy’s widely published letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging for the speedy disposal of the Ayodhya case by giving directions to government law officers.

Kapil Sibal and the main lawyers Rajeev Dhavan and Dushyant Dave all tried their best to stall the arguments in the beginning itself by telling a blatant lie in the court that the documents were not supplied. But it was exposed by the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, representing the Uttar Pradesh Government and Harish Salve representing Hindu Mahants by pointing out that all documents from their part were received by the Sibal’s side.

Then Sibal, representing the Sunni Wakf Board, Dave and agent provocateur Dhavan, who often uses abusive words inside and outside the courts, started bullying the Bench led by Chief Justice (CJI) Dipak Misra, comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer. First, they said that this case should be heard by a larger Bench, then they said the case would be held only by July 2019 and at last, they staged a drama by declaring that they need permission to boycott the court!

A high voltage drama ensued, with lawyers representing the Sunni Waqf Board and the Babri Masjid Action Committee, virtually threatening to walk out of the proceedings as the bench asked senior advocate C S Vaidyanathan, representing the deity Ram Lala Virajman, to commence his submissions in the case. When the bench headed by the CJI rejected their contention that the matter be sent to a larger bench saying “no, no…”, Sibal, appearing for Sunni Wakf Board, said, “I do believe that any decision, in this case, will have very serious ramifications and the appeals should be referred to a five or seven-judge constitution bench. Do not say ‘no, no, no’. Please hear the matter keeping in mind the ramifications…”

He further said, “please fix the matter in July 2019 and we assure that we will not seek any adjournments… Justice should not only be done, it should seem to be done.”

The bench countered expressing shock and surprise and asked, “What kind of submission is this? You are saying July 2019. Should it not be heard before that?”

Another senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for one of the parties, questioned the “hurry” in hearing the appeals and referred to the fact that the issue of Ram Temple was part of the BJP manifesto. To this, the bench retorted: “You say it should not be heard ever only because it was not heard in last seven years.”

At last Sibal tried to provoke BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, the intervenor in the case by alleging that Swamy is behind the speedy listing of the case. Sibal produced Swamy’s widely published letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi urging for the speedy disposal of the Ayodhya case by giving directions to government law officers. He read out Swamy’s letter. But Swamy kept quiet, smiling witnessing Sibal reading his letter to Modi. Keeping decorum inside the Court, Swamy started attacking Sibal and Congress in the media after the hearing.

Sibal’s move has created a huge embarrassment for Congress. Sibal had created another flutter after his infamous Zero Loss Theory for the party. Can the Congress party risk its future in the 2019 elections and beyond, if its prominent leader Sibal continues this line of questioning?

The agenda of the anti-Ram Mandir brigade is very clear. They want to scuttle the hearing. If hearing starts, they knew the Judgment will come before October 2018, before the retirement of Chief Justice Dipak Misra. Come February, will they adopt the same strategy and pay a big political price?

Team PGurus

We are a team of focused individuals with expertise in at least one of the following fields viz. Journalism, Technology, Economics, Politics, Sports & Business. We are factual, accurate and unbiased.

9 COMMENTS

  1. Easy to understand why cases get delayed in courts, is it because of delaying tactics of men like Kapil Sibal…… no wonder what election has to do with national issues…

  2. FAT FEE MINDED MEN CANT TALK SENSE AS HE IS DERAILED FROM HIS BALANCE IN SENSES!
    SUPREME COURT IS TO JUDGE ALL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ‘SATYA’ AND ‘NYAY ‘
    BABRI MASJID IN FACT WAS A TEMPLE DUE TO BIRTH OF LORD RAM MANY MANY MANY YEARS AGO AND ITS A FIRM BELIEF WHICH IS BEING QUESTIOND?! RAM’S BIRTH WAS NEARLY 25 LAKHS OF YEARS AGO!
    COMPARED TO THAT BABAR GOT THE TEMPLE GRABBED AROUND 1500AD (historians will tell correct date)
    what is 1500 compared to 25,00,000 ‘?
    THEN THE BELIEF IN ÁLLAH’ A VERY RECENT BELIEF AND ALL BRUTALITIES IN THE NAME OF ‘ALLAH WILL SUPERSEDE IN TERMS OF ‘NYAY?
    THERE ARE MULTI FACTORS TO CONSIDER1
    WHY NEHRU GROUP ADOPTED ‘SECULAR PRINCIPLE’IN PREAMBLE TO ALLOW SUCH DEMONIC NONSENSE? WAS THIS PART OF PARTITIONED BRITISH INDIA NOT INHABITED BY LARGE NUMBERS OF HINDUS?
    NEHRU WANTED TO GIVE RELIEFS TO HIS MUSLIM BRETHREN?
    TRUTH HAS ALL ITS WEAPONS IN ITS BASKET!
    AND A SENIOR LAWYER WHO RAN A SHOW AS A MINISTER IN UPA REGIME TALKS IN A WAY WHICH A BABY OF NURSERY TOO WILL NOT!
    SO? THE CASE IS EASY TO SOLVE AND SUPREME COURT JUDGES KNOW IT!
    QUESTION IS WHETHER THE BARBARICS WILL OBEY?

  3. Is Sibal at all mature? A MATURE MAN HAS A CONSCIENCE ,HAS A SENSE OF UNBIASNESS, !
    WE PARDON HIM BECAUSE HE IS EXPOSED TOTALLY! HE IS ANTINATIONAL !
    SUPREME COURT DOES NOT WORK BY A SINGLE IMMATURE MAN’S SAY!
    OTHER LAWYERS AND NO MEAN!
    MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE HAS A NEED AND ALL FUNCTIONARIES ARE WORKING TO SERVE PEOPLE!
    SRI SRI RAM IS A BELIEF! IF HIS BIRTH PLACE IS IGNORED A BELIEF WILL BE IGNORED AND ITS A BELIEF OF MAJORITY! AS A COUNTER MOVE IT CAN BE SAID AND WILL BE SAID ÁLLAH’ TOO DID NOT EXIST IN ANY SANE MAN! ITS ALL FABRICATED AND TO GRAB THE WORLD THE BRUTALITY MIXED WITH ÁLLAH ‘ HAS BEEN PSYCHOLOGICALLY PRESSED INTO MINDS OF PARTIES WHO CALL THEM SECULAR!
    WHO INVITED THOSE ARAB INVADERS TO INVADE?
    ITS INHUMANLY LUST!
    BABRI THEORIES ARE SUPPORTING INHUMAN CAUSES ONLY AND SO DEPLORED!
    DOES MR SIBAL UNDERSTAND IT?

  4. The trojan virus & malware called Kapil Sibal should be striped off his bar council license & govt has to list out all the cases he has handled till date on a website for viewers how much damage he has done to India.

  5. With regards to Hon’ble Supreme Court, the behavior of senior lawyers was not what is normally expected of them .The Hon’ble judges should such things seriously and take action to maintain the dignity of the judiciary which should never be compromised. The stand taken by the bench is welcomed across all sections of the society. The Job of Judiciary is to deliver justice and the law and order is the duty of executive.

  6. Will such attitude be tolerated in any other realm? Can a MLA bully a CM? Can a nurse bully the Chief Dr?

    ‘Senior Lawyers’ are indirectly saying, “CJI and other Judges, you should not hear this case. Let some other Judges hear this case in future”. CJI is considered even more powerful than the PM, in some ways.

    Surely there are more decent ways of expressing opinions and even expressing dissent. Will a common man be allowed to do something similar in a Court, more so in the SC, esp to CJI? Are Senior Lawyers of the SC anyway superior to the common man? We thought law is common to everyone.

    Public are shocked by such bahaviour of ‘Senior Lawyers’. Why do Courts tolerate such bahaviour? Shouldn’t such Senior Lawyers be handed our exemplery punishment, so such behaviour is not repeated by anyone else in future? If this is not done, people will lose faith in the judiciary.

  7. Who exactly are the direct parties in this case? Are they not the appelants and respondants who were the parties to the case heard and decided by the High Court? Are not all others interlopers trying to derail the proceedings? Was Sunni Wakf Board a party in the. High Court? Can or should the Supreme Court succumb to blacmail of possible violent repurcussions in the country without its own majesty and dignity being compromised and undermined?

  8. Totally uncouth like behaviour from Kapil Sibal and gang. Congress will pay big political price for this. Time for Virat Hindus unite. Jai Shri Ram…Mandir wahi banayega….. Kashi Mathura baki hai

LEAVE A REPLY