As Modi prepares to defend his performance and government in 2019, this book will arm his supporters with a plethora of information that they can use to help him along the way.
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi is the most vilified politician in India in the last two decades. Much to the chagrin of his detesters (and they are available for dime a dozen these days), Madhu Kishwar has unveiled hitherto unknown facts about Modi in this book whose tagline reads “Voices from Narendra Modi’s Gujarat”.
My previous experience of reading about Gujarat riots is through Communal Rage in Secular India by Rafiq Zakaria back in the early 2000s. The book is a mixture of liberal concoctions from a wide array of media reports, including the article by Arundhati Roy which till date serves as an epitome of fiction and filth. With a foreword by Amartya Sen – the name alone is a harbinger of intellectual dishonesty, there’s not much to expect in terms of facts. Although the author devotes an entire Chapter on “What Should The Muslims Do” offering prescriptions to his own community to integrate with the mainstream and shed the ghetto mentality, the scholarship and the due diligence vis-a-vis literature on the riots are grossly missing.
Maulana Isa Mansuri did not let Modi speak for an hour; he spoke in the harshest tones and words. But Modi did not interrupt any of them for a minute.
By contrast, Madhu’s book is predicated on facts, augmented by cross-verification of the same; interviews and video recorded conversations all add to the depth and credibility of the information presented. The holistic approach she took to studying the functioning of his government before and after the riots, including highlighting the stellar earthquake disaster relief work under Narendra Modi, is a lesson on investigative work to several established and aspiring journalists. Forewards by the late Cho Ramaswamy and Salim Khan is an appropriate segway into rest of the book.
Having been bred the usual dose of Modiphobic content in cross-section of the media, She sets out answering many questions and pointing out several good facets of his administration completely ignored by the mainstream media.
She dispels the myth propagated by the anti-Modi brigade with first-person accounts, facts & evidence.
Worth repeating: first-person accounts, facts & evidence.
Dispelling the Modi Myth
She quotes extensively from a number of people who came in contact with Modi vis-a-vis riots.
She starts with the account of Zafar Sareshwala and Maulana Isa Mansuri meeting with Modi in London in August 2003. The meeting was arranged by Mahesh Bhatt, on the request of Zafar Sareshwala, through Modi’s good friend Rajat Sharma.
In fact, it was Mahesh Bhatt who encouraged Zafar to “start the process of engagement with Modi”.
Yes, that’s right. It was Mahesh Bhatt!
Quoting from Zafar’s account of the meeting:
“Maulana Isa Mansuri did not let Modi speak for an hour; he spoke in the harshest tones and words. But Modi did not interrupt any of them for a minute. After they had finished, Modi responded in detail with facts of each case they narrated…Then he told the Maulana, You know very well I had been chief minister only for four-and-a-half months…Therefore, I did not have a full grip over the administration.”
“It took him 2-3 years to put governance on track. Even the police know it is on watch and Modi will not overlook any laxity or partisan conduct. That is the reason why today the Muslims feel very secure and safe in Gujarat. They know that no injustice will be done to them.”
She also reveals quizzical and hypocritical nature of Mahesh Bhatt.
Upon hearing about Bhatt’s criticism of Modi in a speech in Gujarat, Modi called him and said: “Maheshbhai, you want to come with five Muslims, or 50, or 500 or 5000 – pick a venue of your choice. I am ready to meet all of you I am ready to solve all the problems you bring to my notice. I want you to know that I am available.”
Mahesh Bhatt never took on that offer. One wonders if Mahesh Bhatt’s concerns for Muslims are genuine.
Mahesh Bhatt had gone to Gujarat in 2005 on account of relief work for floods that hit the state. He quotes:
“In 2002, I saw a complete breakdown of law and order in Ahmedabad, and the Muslims were living in terror. This time, I saw a very hopeful face of Muslims during the natural disaster. They were dealt with compassion and care by the establishment. That gave me hope that the river was changing its course.”
This was in 2005, three years after the riots.
This is what the author had to say about Mahesh Bhatt:
“Of the entire anti-Modi brigade, Mahesh Bhatt is the only one to have acknowledged such facts truthfully. However, even he has not been able to break with his ideological prejudice and continues to attack Modi on TV Channels.”
It certainly was a pleasant surprise to learn about his disaster relief work and how it resulted in becoming a global role model.
V.V Augustine from Kerala, member of National Minorities Commission, represented Christian Community of Vapi who have been trying to get a burial ground for the last 40 years. None of the previous administration listened to them. It was Modi who sanctioned them a ground.
V.V Augustine has this to say:
“People who spread the canard that Modi is against minorities are reflecting their own political biases. My experience is entirely different. He listens very carefully and acts very fast in case of genuine problems.”
Madhu dispels the myth about Modi with elaborate accounts from a variety of sources. It is important to note that Modi was the first CM to have given a riot-free decade in Gujarat.
A riot-free decade in Gujarat? Yes.
Let that sink.
Initial Days as Chief Minister
Modi had much to navigate and learn about governance and administration during his initial days and months as Gujarat Chief Minister. Madhu reproduces an English translation of Modi’s first speech as CM.
She says, “It has no bluster, no divisive rhetoric, no communal appeal”.
Madhu Kiswar details his efforts on earthquake rehabilitation work, his focus on development for all and his opponents efforts in discrediting him at every step, fostering false charges & accusations using an ecosystem consisting of political parties, politicians, NGOs and in few cases colluding with his own enemies in BJP, VHP, Bajrang Dal and RSS!
Disaster relief and rehabilitation – A global role model
It certainly was a pleasant surprise to learn about his disaster relief work and how it resulted in becoming a global role model. This fetched few international awards! She also lists few countries that benefitted from Gujarat’s relief and rehabilitation knowledge and experience.
She quotes Modi:
“The Gujarat government has played a key role in shaping the disaster management module prepared by Srilanka. Similarly, Iran took 50-60% of our module for their rehabilitation measures after an earthquake hit the region. The post-Taliban rehabilitation work in Afghanistan was based on a plan prepared by an officer of the Gujarat government. ”
Modi government even offered to sponsor 2 Ph.D.’s per university nationwide for students to conduct research on relief and rehabilitation, but none of the Chancellors took up the offer!
“In any other country, there would have been 100 Ph.D’s.”
On the stellar reconstruction work, she concludes:
“Modi’s opponents have assured that none of this got any attention outside Gujarat…no social scientist has bothered to study the story of Kutch rising out of its own ashes…Unfortunately, even the BJP has not taken the trouble to let the rest of India know this story.”
25th February 2002 by-elections – Modi’s first election win
Modi’s victory in the by-election on 25th February 2002 knocked the living daylights out of Congress due to overwhelming Muslim support for Modi.
This was just 2 days before Godhra train massacre.
Let this sink in.
“Modi never appealed to Muslims as a separate vote bank. He responded creatively to their legitimate social, economic and cultural requirements as citizens without pandering to their communal identity. This approach threatened the very survival of the Congress Party. Not surprisingly, the Congress Party retaliated with fury.”
Isn’t it natural to draw a parallel to this day in 2018?
She dedicates an entire chapter on the Godhra train massacre, quoting extensively from Justice Nanavati Commission report and also opining on the illegal Banerjee Committee appointed by UPA. Plenty of references to newspaper reports and headlines of those times highlighting the bias and prejudices of the media community at large.
She adds: “…very few are aware that the Nanavati Commission and the courts found Godhra violence to be the handiwork of mischievous elements within the Congress Party who also allegedly had links with Pakistani outfits”.
Modi supporters must take cognizance of this and expose the Congress further.
Gujarat Riots – Facts ignored
It is well known that the mainstream media played a selective role in reportage. There were many incidents that were painted differently or altogether ignored. One such incident is narrated by India Today correspondent Uday Madhurkar over the phone.
“Rioting did not start in the morning of February 28….Between 10:30 and 11:30 am an auto driver named Ranjeet Vanjara was parked near a masjid in Naroda Patiya. A group of Muslims dragged him into the gali near their masjid. On seeing this, Hindus began shouting for help. Police came within 20 minutes. When they went in the gali, they found the dead body of Vanjara outside the mosque. His eyes had been gouged. This inflamed the Hindus and they went on a rampage.”
The author narrates several accounts of relief work undertaken following the riots. None of them point to any bias.
He proceeds to point out two more such incidents that provoked the Hindus.
She exposes the flippant attitude of Congress when two of its State Governments refused para-military support which was requested by Gujarat Government.
The NGO network worked overtime to blame Modi and paint him as a modern-day “Nero”. Rias Khan, a former associate of Teesta Setalvad had many things to say about the bias.
“I had submitted photographic evidence of Muslims also attacking Hindu areas. Many Muslims suffered injuries from police firings because they were also attacking Hindus. But Teesta did not publicise that evidence.”
The author narrates several accounts of relief work undertaken following the riots. None of them point to any bias.
K P S Gill was appointed by Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee as a special advisor to the CM. His Officer on Special Duty, Abdullah Ibrahim Syed had this to say:
“Narendra Modi is the last person to indulge in the politics of riots. He is from my home district….The riots were engineered by his enemies to defame him.”
“…If even a small shred of evidence had been found against Narendra Modi, there would have been any number of cases filed against him by now. However, till date, neither the Congress Party nor its allied NGOs have been able to file a single FIR against Modi.”
Why is this a well-researched book?
This book complements Nanavati Commission report and SIT findings very well and is well-researched for two reasons:
First, on Gujarat riots, the author uncovers facts. She lists out Modi’s preventive measures, army deployment, day-wise actions the first week of the riots, and relief and rehabilitation measures in great detail. Modi’s response to the riots added to the agony of the anti-Modi ecosystem. She exposes the anti-Modi ecosystem thoroughly by bring out facts of tragedies that were “spiced up” and dismantling popular media distortions.
Second, the book cites several examples of his administrative capabilities, inclusive development, various skill development initiatives, his penchant for participatory development all the way from 2001. One can certainly relate this to his current focus as PM.
What one will learn about Modi are his work ethics, far-sighted thinking, result and an outcome-oriented mind.
This is a must-read book for his supporters. As Modi prepares to defend his performance and government in 2019, this book will arm his supporters with a plethora of information that they can use to help him along the way.
Cho Ramaswamy is absolutely right. The book is “unputdownable”.
1. The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of PGurus.